INTRODUCTION
Burnout syndrome (BOS), is regarded as a psychological and emotional stress state, experienced by health personnel who treat structurally vulnerable patients
1,also, it often appears in heterogeneous atmospheres, from urban community hospitals until global health settings
2,3. . Many researchers
4 could describe it as a combination of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and low personal performance due to chronic stress of medical practice. Nowadays, it is considered as an answer to chronic occupational stress experienced by many professionals whose direct contact with people is a key part to the labor they carry out
5,6.
It has come to view as a mental health problem because of overexertion held all the time, which may increase risk of mental disease, even heart disease
7,8. Not to mention the potential to negatively affect performance and quality service while professionals perform work functions
9.
It has been reported worldwide that 45% of physicians have had BOS or have it, including general and house physicians. In these latter the rate can reach 80% for being a staff who performs greater activity
10. Stress in health professionals is significantly higher regarding other professions, ranging between 30 and 40% more
11, because they deal with human suffering, long working hours and, frequently, they are constantly subjected to an insufficient income.
In Peru, the 2014 largest study found a higher prevalence in physicians (3.7%) rather than in nurses (2.1%)
12. For everything mentioned, it could be estimated that physicians are a vulnerable group to experience BOS, which may predispose them to provide a poor quality treatment towards patients and increase medical errors. Not to mention their exposure to health detriment
13.
This research work arises from the need to identify Burnout Syndrome associated factors in physicians at a hospital in the Peruvian Amazon, as well as their repercussion in physician-patient relationship.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Analytical cross-sectional study carried out throughout the month of October 2017, addressed to physicians who worked in outpatients departments from medical, gynecology and obstetrics, and pediatrics services at Regional Hospital of Pucallpa.
It included those physicians or specialists who worked in outpatients departments in October 2017 and those who accepted being part of the study. Afterwards, patients were surveyed after their consultation ended and/or parents whose children were treated in pediatrics. It excluded those patients with some kind of mental retardation or condition that may affect their lucidity, those who were hemodynamically unstable or who failed on completing the survey. Moreover, it only included respondents who provided their informed consent properly.
The initial population of the study was made up of 40 physicians distributed in the previously mentioned services. However, there was a 25% rejection rate (10 physicians), thus they had to be removed, as well as their patients.
DATA COLLECTION TECHNIQUES AND INSTRUMENTS
This research work was carried out once approved by Ethics Board of Ucayali National University Faculty of Medicine Human. Authorization of the institution was requested and subsequently that of the Regional Hospital of Pucallpa administration, in order to carry out the study. Thereafter, physicians were invited to be part of the research, filling data collection instruments with those who accepted. Immediately after doing this, outpatients treated in a 2-weeks period were surveyed. Every respondent was informed about the aim of the study to invite him/her to be part of it.
A two-questionnaire survey gathered the whole information. The first questionnaire made a BOS diagnosis, employing Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) addressed to physicians. The second one measured perception of physician-patient relationship, employing PREMEPA scale addressed to outpatients.
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is a validated-to-Spanish scale
14, factor analysis (questionnaire and its components) with a Cronbach’s alpha higher than 0.7
15. It consist of 22 items which measure three main components: depersonalization (DP) corresponding to items 5, 10, 11, 15, 22; emotional exhaustion (EE) corresponding to items 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 13, 14, 16, 20; and self-fulfillment (SF) corresponding to items 4, 7, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21. Every item has 7 response options following a Likert scale, from 0 meaning “never” until 6 meaning “every day”
16. Scores obtained measure disturbance rates, including the three previously mentioned components. Depersonalization, suggesting a low DP (0-5 marks), moderate DP (6-9 marks) and severe DP (10-30 marks); emotional exhaustion, suggesting a low EE (0-18 marks), moderate EE (19-26 marks) and severe EE (27-54 marks); and self-fulfillment, suggesting a low SF (0-33 marks), moderate SF (34-39 marks) and severe SF (40-48 marks)
16. Finally, those who met criteria were considered, such as, severe EE or DP, and/or a low SF
17. Throughout our study, the cut-off point was the presence of two or more criteria.
PREMEPA scale, instrument whose internal consistency through Kuder-Richardson Formula was of 0.83, and a 91.3% reliability index
18. It consists of 14 items: item 1 identifies if the patient sought help before; items 2-9 with options following Likert scale, whose values range from 0 to 3, measuring the professional characteristics to his/her patients; items 10-13 possess a dichotomous scale whose values range from 0 (negative answer) until 3 (positive answer). Total score measures three categories, consisting of: a proper physician-patient relationship (≥ 15 marks); a moderate proper physician-patient relationship (from 14 until 9 marks) and an improper physician-patient relationship (≤ 8 marks). Similarly, item 14 measured patient satisfaction with medical care, through a vigesimal scale, suggesting they were very satisfied (greater than 15 marks), not very satisfied (less than 10 marks) and moderately satisfied with a mid-range score
18.
Moreover, six dimensions were designated. These were responsible of measuring empathy dimensions employed by items 3 and 4 from PREMEPA questionnaire (value from 0 until 6 marks); courtesy dimension, item 2 (value from 0 until 3 marks); dimension of humanity, item 5 (value from 0 until 3 marks); dimension of confidence, item 6 (value from 0 until 3 marks); dimension of participation, items 7, 8, 10, 11 (value from 0 until 10 marks); and dimension of intention to return, item 12 (value from 0 until 3 marks)
19.
In addition, physician’s general characteristics were measured, taking into account sex, specialty, weekly working hours, and years of experience. The latter section measured patient’s general characteristics, considering sex, age, type of patient (new, continued), level of education, monthly household income, occupation and civil status.
After that the sample of physicians and outpatients was collected, it was determined who met criteria with BOS. Afterwards, it was obtained the score of physician-patient relationship and satisfaction levels, measured from patient’s perception. Their average was calculated in order to analyze them. Later, data were analyzed using the statistical package STATA 15.0, where qualitative variables were presented in frequencies and percentages; and quantitative variables, in mean and standard deviation, if they showed a normal distribution. Poisson generalized linear models were employed for inferential statistics through crude (cPR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR), according to main characteristics, considering a p-value of <<0.05 as statistically significant.
RESULTS
The studied sample of physicians consisted of 30 physicians, of which 76.7% were male (23), median age was 44 years old, with interquartile ranges of 41-52. 83.3% was married, and only 13.4% was single. 53.3% of physicians were from the coast (Trujillo, Ica and Lima), 26.7% from sierra (Junín, Arequipa, Cusco and Huánuco) and only 20% from the Amazon (Ucayali).
Concerning their professional work, 33.3% (10) of physicians did not have an specialty; only 6.7% (2) of physicians did not have a private practice. Only 46.7% (14) of respondents worked less than 7 hours weekly. Median of years practicing their professions as physicians was 18 years, with interquartile ranges of 9-27.
Among medical specialists, 16.7% (5) were obstetricians; 10% (3), orthopedists; 6.7% (2), pediatricians, neurologists and general practitioners; other specialties were taking into account, such as cardiology, infectious disease, anesthesiology, general surgery, urology and ophthalmology.
Regarding BOS, emotional exhaustion subscale pointed out 6.7%, 86.6% and 6.7% showed a low, moderate and severe emotional exhaustion, in that order. Levels of depersonalization pointed out only 3.3% and 96.7% showed a moderate and severe degree, respectively. When it comes to self-fulfillment, 76.7% and 23.3% showed low and medium degrees. Thus, this research work considered physicians with BOS those who met two out of three components, determining only 20% (6) did not suffer from professional burnout
(Table 1).
Table 1. Prevalence of professional burnout and its components’ characteristics
|
N(%) |
Emotional Exhaustion |
Low |
2 (6,7%) |
Moderate |
26 (86,6%) |
Severe |
2 (6,7%) |
Depersonalization |
Moderate |
1 (3,3%) |
Severe |
29 (96,7%) |
Self-fulfillment |
Bajo |
23 (76,7%) |
Medio |
7 (23,3%) |
Burnout Syndormet |
Without professional burnout |
6 (20%) |
With professional burnout |
24 (80%) |
Regarding outpatients, 69.1% (145) were female. Only 48.6% (102) were married and 35.2% (74) had a monthly income lower than 900 soles, while only 19.1% (40) earned an income greater than 1 500 soles. When it comes to level of education, 3.8% (8) did not had education, 5.2% (11) only had primary education and 48.6% (102) had higher education.
Regarding level of satisfaction of consultation, 20% (42) expressed they were very satisfied, only 1% (2) were not very satisfied. In addition, 83.3% (175) had a proper physician-patient relationship, and 16.7% (35) had a moderate proper physician-patient. Despite this, there was no evidence about a low or improper physician-patient relationship.
According to the average about dimensions from PREMEPA questionnaire, results closer to maximum score were obtained in terms of Empathy, Courtesy, Humanity, Confidence, Participation and Intention to Return. Every dimension of questionnaire showed a coefficient of variation (CV) lower than 50%, displaying a homogeneous distribution of data
(Table 2).
Table 2. Dimensions of perception about physician-patient relationship from the patients’ perspective at Regional Hospital of Pucallpa
X: Average
S.D.: Standard Deviation
C.V.: Coefficient of variation
|
|
|
|
95% of confidence of the difference
|
PERCEPTION
|
X
|
S.D.
|
C.V.
|
Lower
|
Higher
|
Empathy
|
4.55
|
0.84
|
18.46
|
4.44
|
4.66
|
Courtesy
|
2.80
|
0.40
|
14.29
|
2.75
|
2.85
|
Humanity
|
2.80
|
0.40
|
14.29
|
2.75
|
2.85
|
Confidence
|
2.22
|
0.43
|
19.37
|
2.16
|
2.28
|
Participation
|
7.46
|
0.85
|
11.39
|
7.34
|
7.58
|
Return
|
2.90
|
0.54
|
18.62
|
2.83
|
2.97
|
Regarding crude analysis, there was no association found between BOS, age and sex; thus, it was not taken into account in our research. However, medical residence and service did have statistically significant relationship with BOS. Concerning adjusted analysis, it could be determined that doctors who carried out medical residence were 38% less likely to suffer from BOS (aPR: 0.62; CI 95%: 0.62 – 0.77), in comparison with those who worked without having carried out any residence. Working on surgery practices predispose physicians to be 1.46 (aPR: 1.46; CI 95%: 1.20 – 1.76) more likely to have professional burnout, as well as those who worked on gynecology service, being 69% more likely to suffer from burnout syndrome (aPR: 1.69; CI 95%: 1.41 – 2.03), in comparison with those who worked on medical service
(Table 3).
Table 3. Crude and adjusted analysis about burnout syndrome and its associated factors
*cPR: Crude prevalence ratio
**aPR: Adjusted prevalence ratio
|
Crude analysis
|
Adjusted analysis
|
|
cPR*
|
CI 95 %
|
p
|
aPR**
|
CI 95%
|
p
|
Medical residence
|
0.70
|
0.62 – 0.78
|
<0.001
|
0.62
|
0.62 – 0.77
|
<0.001
|
Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicine
|
Ref.
|
|
|
Ref.
|
|
|
Pediatrics
|
1.25
|
0.94 – 1.66
|
0.128
|
1.15
|
0.89 – 1.48
|
0.261
|
Surgery
|
1.48
|
1.19 – 1.82
|
<0.001
|
1.46
|
1.20 – 1.76
|
<0.001
|
Gynecology
|
1.66
|
1.37 – 2.01
|
<0.001
|
1.69
|
1.41 – 2.03
|
<0.001
|
Finally, it was found out physicians with BOS were 59% (aPR: 1.59; IC 95%: 1.22 - 2.07) more likely to perform an improper consultation and/or that the patient feels not very satisfied with the consultation
(Table 4).
Table 4. Burnout syndrome and quality of hospital care at a hospital in the Peruvian Amazon.
*cPR: Crude prevalence ratio
**aPR: Adjusted prevalence ratio
|
Crude analysis |
Adjusted analysis |
|
cPR* |
CI 95 % |
p |
aPR** |
CI 95% |
p |
Physician-patient relationship |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderate physician-patient relationship |
Ref. |
|
|
Ref. |
|
|
Proper physician-patient relationship |
0.87 |
0.70 – 1.09 |
0.234 |
0.92 |
0.76 – 1.11 |
0.398 |
Satisfaction of consultation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very satisfied |
Ref. |
|
|
Ref. |
|
|
Moderately satisfied |
1.10 |
0.91 – 1.33 |
0.329 |
1.14 |
0.96 – 1.35 |
0.125 |
Not very satisfied |
1.35 |
1.13 – 1.62 |
0.001 |
1.59 |
1.22 – 2.07 |
<0.001 |
DISCUSSION
Nowadays, there are multiple research which define Burnout prevalence in different populations, such as medical undergraduate
20, in-terns
21, residents
22 and assistants
23. In our study, 8 out of 10 physicians had BOS. There are lower registered frequencies which ranged from 5% until 45% in Tacna
24, Colombia
25, Mexico
26,27 and Argentina
28. However, similar numbers to ours were found in Mexico
29.
All this research shows us a high rate of professional burnout at a very early stage, in which physicians found themselves submitted to many stressful situations, not only during their education, but also while performing in the workforce. There has been demonstrated that professional burnout is often increased by many adverse event in providing medical services, in both learning impairments and depressive disorders increase
21.
In the same way, provided care by surgery, and gynecology and obstetrics services, predisposed physicians to suffer from professional burnout. Similar to those found in Brazil
23 and Mexico
30,which suggest surgical fields in Peru also lead our physicians to suffer from high levels of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and/or possibly, low levels of self-fulfillment. Thus, various interventions had been carried out in order to reduce working hours of physicians with BOS. However, only interventions had been effective so far, but it could not have been possible to reduce completely the incidence of BOS
31.
Having a medical residency or a specialty represented a 38% less likelihood to suffer from BOS, a hard-to-contrast reality due to contradictory results found which reaffirm that medical specialties are the ones who suffer most this syndrome
32-37. In spite of this, a study carried out at a Peruvian hospital determined that only 27.8% of its specialist physicians had BOS
38. This protective factor may be due to years of experience and/or to a big number of hours of hospital practice which give physicians more confidence and a higher level of self-fulfillment (one of BOS’ components). Moreover, having higher education would explain the reason why they have more confidence in comparison to their outpatient colleagues, representing a protective factor to BOS development.
Our study found that physicians with BOS provide a not very satisfactory care from patient’s perception. Few studies have been carried out about the relationship between medical practice and BOS. Some studies suggest that an increase in BOS levels causes a tense physician-patient relationship, which leads to a little satisfaction regarding consultation. Nevertheless, there are other measures, such as improving level of knowledge or self-learning, self-assessment and BOS levels; providing psychological counselling in order to provide means of relief to physicians, reduction measures to control both production and worsening of professional burnout in physicians, as a crucial measure to improve patient’s satisfaction regarding consultation
39,40.
Physician-patient relationship is the basis of medical clinical practice. In the last decades, changes such as technological development and a higher degree of specialization, have influenced within this relationship. Physicians’ degree of satisfaction regarding their hospital practice have been also considered a main determinant towards this relationship. Most of the studies carried out have little focused in how physicians experience and face these changes in their profession
41. Our research could identify patients’ perception regarding physician-patient relationship and each of its components. However, we did not identified quality of physician-patient relationship from physicians’ perception. It in consequently recommended to study as bi-directional this latter in further research.
This research presented certain limitations, such as rejection rate of physicians to participate and survey their patients after medical practice, besides not carrying out a case-control study or longitudinal case study to be able to determine its causality. Our research recommends to improve health care system, by a proper distribution of patients to physicians, to increase consultation time and to be able to improve both patient’s perception and satisfaction in proportion, in order to provide physicians a psychological assistance and to further determine their professional burnout by proper advice services.
In conclusion, our research states that 8 out of 10 physicians developed BOS. Patients expressed to have a proper physician-patient relationship despite the high rate of BOS. Surgical specialties predispose physicians to develop BOS.
Contibuciones de autoría:Los autores participaron
en la génesis de la idea, diseño de proyecto, recolección
e interpretación de datos, análisis de resultados y
preparación del manuscrito del presente trabajo de
investigación.
Financiamiento:Autofinanciado
Conflicts of interest This research work was part of undergraduate thesis from surgeon mario milton marchand gonzales. However, authors of this research work declare thay have no conflicts of interest.
Correspondece: Jennifer Steffany Vilchez Cornejo
Address: Jr. Ramón Castilla 159 Mz E Lote 11
Phone: 0051 61 961 506 868
E-mail: j.vilchezcornejo@gmail.com
2. Kim MH, Mazenga AC, Simon K, Yu X, Ahmed S, Nyasulu P, et al. Burnout and self-reported suboptimal patient care amongst health care workers providing HIV care in Malawi. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192983. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192983
3. Saijo Y, Chiba S, Yoshioka E, Kawanishi Y, Nakagi Y, Ito, T et al. Job stress and burnout among urban and rural hospital physicians in Japan. Aust J Rural Health. 2013;21(4):225-231. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12040
4. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 4th ed Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden Inc; 2016.
8. Rosende M, Kesque J, Romero MB, Rosende MC, Nelida-Severino M. Síndrome de Burnout: Padecimiento en instituciones públicas. 2009. Disponible en:
http://psiqu.com/1-4129
10. Roldán, A. M. A., & Barriga, A. M. Q. Síndrome por quemarse en el trabajo y variables familiares y laborales de los médicos generales de Bogotá. Una estrategia de calidad laboral. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 44(4), 2015; 198-205. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcp.2015.05.017
12. Maticorena-Quevedo J, Beas R, Anduaga-Beramendi A, Mayta-Tristán P. Prevalencia del síndrome de burnout en médicos y enfermeras del Perú, Ensusalud 2014. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2016;33(2):241-7. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2016.332.2170
14. Gil-Monte P. Validez factorial de la adaptación al español del Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey. Salud Publica Mex. 2002; 44: 33-40. Disponible en:
http://www.insp.mx/salud/index.html
15. Cáceres-Mejía B, Roca-Quicaño R, Torres M, Pavic-Espinoza I, Mezones-Holguín E, Fiestas F. Análisis factorial del "Cuestionario para la evaluación del síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo" en estudiantes de medicina peruanos. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Barc.). 2013. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. rpsm.2013.06.002
17. Vásquez-Manrique JF, Maruy-Saito A, Verne-Martín E. Frecuencia del síndrome de burnout y niveles de sus dimensiones en el personal de salud del Servicio de Emergencia de Pediatría del Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia en el año 2014. Lima, Perú. Rev Neuropsiquiatr. 2014; 77 (3): 168-174. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.20453/rnp.v77i3.2031
18. Ramos R. Percepción de las relaciones médico-paciente por parte de los usuarios externos del Departamento de Medicina del Hospital Carrión, Callao-Perú Lima; 2008https://doi.org/10.15381/anales.v69i1.1173. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.15381/anales.v69i1.1173
19. Núñez-Morales R, Arias-Cornejo M, Sánchez-Sánchez N, Hernández-Porras T, Bustamante-Bravo V, Reupo-Vallejos M et al. Relación médico-paciente desde la perspectiva del paciente en el Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo 2014. Rev. Exp. Med. 2015; 1 (1); 20-4. Disponible en:
http://rem.hrlamb.gob.pe/index.php/REM/article/view/12
20. Vilchez-Cornejo J, Huamán-Gutiérrez R, Arce-Villalobos L, Morán-Mariños C, Mihashiro-Maguiña K, Melo-Mallma N et all. Síndrome de burnout en estudiantes de medicina: frecuencia, características y factores asociados. Act Med Per, 2016. 33(4):282-8. Disponible en:
http://www.amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/221/169
21. Reyes-Ticas A, Medina MT, Mesa X, Paredes Y, Barahona Y, Sierra M. Estudio de síndrome de Burnout, depresión y factores asociados en los practicantes internos del Hospital Escuela. Rev Fac Cienc Med. 2012; 9(1): 14-30. Disponible en:
http://www.bvs.hn/RFCM/pdf/2012/pdf/RFCMVol9-1-2012-4.pdf
22. Miyoshi R, Matsuo H, Takeda R, Komatsu H, Abe H, Ishida Y. Burnout in Japanese residents and its associations with temperament and character. Asian J Psy. 2016; 24: 5-9. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.009
23. Nobre de Novais R, Rocha LM, Eloi RJ, Dos-Santos LM, Moura MV, Ribeiro R et all. Burnout síndrome prevalence of on-call surgeons in a trauma reference hospital and its correlation with weekly workload: cross-sectional study. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016005003
25. Paredes G, Olga L; Sanabria-Ferrand, Pablo A. Prevalencia del síndrome de burnout en residentes de especialidades médico quirúrgicas, su relación con el bienestar psicológico y con variables sociodemográficas y laborales. Revista Med. 2008; 16 (1): 25-32. Disponible en:
http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=91016105
26. Aguilera EC, de Alba García JEG. Prevalencia del síndrome de agotamiento profesional (burnout) en médicos familiares mexicanos: análisis de factores de riesgo. Rev Col Psiq. 2010; 39(1): 67-84. Disponible en:
https://10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60237-7
30. Balcázar-Rincón LE, Montejo-Fraga LF, Ramírez-Alcántara YL. Prevalencia del síndrome de desgaste profesional en médicos residentes de un hospital de Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico. Atencion Fam. 2015; 22(4): 111-4. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1405-8871(16)30064-5
31. Gelfrand DV, Podnos YD, Carmichael JC, Saltzman DJ, Wilson SE, Williams RA. Effect of the80-hour workweek on resident Burnout. Arch Surg. 2004;139(9):933-8;discussion 938-40. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.9.933
32. Kuan-Yu Ch, Che-Ming Y, Che-Hui L, Hung-Yi Ch, Mau-Roung L,Hui-Ru Ch et al. Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Medical Malpracice among physicians. Int J Med Sci 2013;10(11):1471-1478. Disponible en:
https://dx.doi.org/10.7150%2Fijms.6743
33. Grau A, Flichtentrei D, Suñer R, Prats M, Braga F. Influencia de factores personales, profesionales y transnacionales en el síndrome de Burnout en personal sanitario hispanoamericano y español (2007). Rev Esp Salud Pública 2009;83:215-30. Disponible en:
http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/resp/v83n2/original1.pdf
34. Joffre-Velázquez VM, Peinado-Herreros JM, Gómez MC, Lin-Ochoa D, Vázquez-Nava F, Llanes-Castillo A. Síndrome de burnout en médicos de un hospital general en el noreste de México. Rev. Elec. Medicina, Salud y Sociedad. 2010; 1(1): 1-23. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25009/remsys.2010.1.18
39. Cohen D, Rhydderch M, Reading P, Williams S. Doctors' health: obstacles and enablers to returning to work. Occup Med (Lond) 2015; 65: 459–65. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv056
40. Merrett A, Jones D, Sein K, Green T, Macleod U. Attitudes of newly qualified doctors towards a career in general practice: a qualitative focus group study. Br J Gen Pract 2017; 67: e253–9. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X690221