Título

CARTA AL EDITOR

REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA HUMANA 2019 - Universidad Ricardo Palma
DOI 10.25176/RFMH.v19i4.2347

EFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINATION AGAINST HUMAN PAPILOMA VIRUS

EFICACIA DE LA VACUNACIÓN CONTRA EL VIRUS DE PAPILOMA HUMANOS

Noemí Rojas-Cisneros1,a,

1 Faculty of Human Medicine, Ricardo Palma University, Lima-Peru
a Medical student.


Mr. Editor

The human papillomavirus (HPV) has a high prevalence in young women, which is why it is considered a public health problem. As their main form of transmission is sexual relations, it is estimated that around 80% of individuals will have contact with this virus in the course of their lives1.

According to reports from the World Health Organization (WHO), the human papillomavirus (HPV) associated with cervical cancer, ranks fourth among the most common types of cancer that affect women, with an estimated number of 570,000 deaths in 20182.

In addition, WHO includes the HPV vaccine as part of national vaccination programs based on the following considerations: It constitutes a public health priority; the introduction of these vaccines is feasible from a programmatic point of view; sustainable financing can be guaranteed; It has cost-effectiveness as a vaccination strategy; and focuses on teenage girls before the start of active sex life; taking into account the aforementioned, it should be considered that the target population will primarily be made up of girls between the ages of 9 or 10 up to 13 years old2,3.

Two HPV vaccines are currently marketed in several countries, a bivalent and a tetravalent vaccine. Both vaccines have been able to prove to be highly effective in preventing infection with types 16 and 18 of the virus, causing around 70% of cervical cancers2.

The bivalent vaccine also acts on variable fractions of cancers of the vulva, vagina, penis, anus and oropharynx associated with HPV 7 and 8, whose efficacy is 68.9-100%; The tetravalent vaccine, in addition to acting on HPV types 16 and 18, has been shown to act on HPV types 6 and 11, responsible for about 90% of external genital warts, being effective at 75-100%. Recently a nonavalent vaccine was approved, which in addition to the 4 types of HPV included in the tetravalent vaccine, has action on HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58, responsible for an additional 20% of cases of cervical cancer. Table 1 shows the efficacy of the vaccine forHPV, in a series of trials4.

In short, prevention includes health education, which is defined as: the exchange of information with the purpose of increasing awareness and knowledge about how to stay healthy and prevent diseases, having available information on the resources that are available and the benefits of accessing health services, is fundamental in the reality of countries like ours5.

Finally, the importance of the efficacy of vaccination as a prophylactic measure against infection with the Human Papillomavirus should be taken into high consideration, since it has shown favorable results to date.



Table 1: Summary of the main results of HPV vaccine trials

√: demonstrated; not demonstrated; +++: very high; ×: none; NA: Does not apply because it was not objective. AIN: anal intraepithelial neoplasia; CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; VaIN: vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia; VIN: vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV: human papillomavirus.
Taken from: Bruni L, Serrano B, Bosch X, Castellsagué X. Vaccine against human papillomavirus. Efficiency and security.
Population studied Outcome Tetravalent Vaccine Bivalent Vaccine Nonavalent Vaccine
Young women (16-26 years old) Efficacy against infection
Effectiveness vs. CIN2 +
Efficacy against CiN3
Effectiveness vs. VIN / VaIN 2/3 ?
Efficacy against genital warts NA
Efficacy against anal infection ? ?
Efficacy against oral infection ? ?
Partial cross protection against infection ?
Cross-protection partially against ClN2 + Therapeutic efficacy ?
Therapeutic efficacy x x x
Security +++ +++ +++
Adult women (25-45 years old) Efficacy against infection ?
Efficacy against CiN2 + ? ?
Immunogenicity ?
Partial cross protection against infection ? ?
Security +++ +++ ?
Young men (16-26 years old) Efficacy against infection ? ?
Efficacy against genital warts NA ?
Efficacy against anal infection ? ?
Effectiveness vs. AIN2 + ? ?
Security +++ +++ ?
Pre-teens (10-14 years old) Immunogenicity ? ?
Security +++ +++ ?

Author contributions: The author made the generation, information gathering, writing and final version of the original article.
Financing: Self-financed.
Conflict of interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.


Correspondence: Noemí Rojas-Cisneros
Address: Av. Alfredo Benavides 5440, Santiago de Surco, Lima, Peru.
Phone: 999999999
Email: mi_rocis@hotmail.com



BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

    1. Medina-Fernández IA, Gallegos Torres RM, Cervera-Baas ME, Cob-Tejeda RA. Conocimiento del virus del papiloma humano y su vacuna por parte de mujeres de una zona rural en Querétaro, México (Costa Rica). REVENF. 2017; (32). [Acceso: 20 de agosto del 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.sa.cr/pdf/enfermeria/n32/1409-4568-enfermeria-32-00026.pdf
    2. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Virus del Papiloma Humano (VPH) y cáncer cervicouterino [Acceso: 20 de agosto del 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/immunization/diseases/hpv/es/
    3. Salome-Pérez ML, Echevarría Ballesteros A. Conocimiento en adolescentes y aceptabilidad en padres de familia por la vacuna del virus del Papiloma Humano en la Microred de Chilca. (Perú). 2018. [Acceso: 20 de agosto del 2019]. Disponible en:http://repositorio.uroosevelt.edu.pe/xmlui/bitstream/handle/ROOSEVELT/129/TESIS%20PARAQUEMAR%20EN%20CD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    4. Bruni L, Serrano B, Bosch X, Castellsagué X. Vacuna frente al virus del papiloma humano. Eficacia y seguridad. (España). EnfermInfeccMicrobiolClin. 2015; 33(5):342-354. [Acceso: 20 de agosto del 2019]. Diponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2015.03.018
    5. Ochoa-Carrillo FJ, Guarneros de Regil DB, Velasco-Jiménez MT. Infección por virus del papiloma humano en mujeres y su prevención. (España). GacMexOncol. 2015; 14(3):157-163. [Acceso: 20 de agosto del 2019]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gamo.2015.08.002
http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2223-2516&lng=en&nrm=iso


Do you want to leave your comment or suggestion about this article?

--> CLICK HERE <---