INTRODUCTION
The fast progress of robotic technique and learning curve in medical procedures provides new opportunities for the biomedical and healthcare engineering
1.
Invention, innovation in technology development are not a simple science. The innovation in healthcare must continue to evolve as technology and resources become accessible; however, innovation really requires some level of risk in patient management because it is important that the robotic device could fulfilled the patient expectancies. Physicians and Medical Centers may not be comfortable with the increased risk associated with innovative medical devices, there are well established procedures to validate a new medical tool / device
2. Therefore, the researchers state some parameters to make a successful research, development and innovation process in the field of medical robotics, as shown in
Table I.
TABLE 1. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION (R+D+I)
Medical Robotics |
Control Aspects |
Positioning |
Trajectories Guidance |
Force Control |
Adjusting |
In Space |
In Time |
To Shape |
To Patient Status |
Introducing the medical robotics in Latin America, it is important to state that those technologies have 10 years of development, but more specialized researchers are needed to start innovations hubs in order to create new technologies for surgical and rehabilitation applications.
In North America, Europe and Asia, the research in medical robotics and devices is highly advanced. In Latin America, the flow procedure to introduce a robot for surgical and rehabilitation application is the following shown in
Fig. 1.
2, where the information presented is suggested to make more patents in the healthcare industry.
Fig. 1. Diagram of Medical Robotic Device and Procedure Innovation
PATIENT MANAGEMENT WITH MEDICAL ROBOTICS
The international innovation in a competitive and rapidly evolving field, such as surgery, rehabilitation and assistance, requires that the community be willing to trade off procedural comfort for the chance to improve outcomes. Therefore, the Healthcare Professionals have been supporting in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment with the application of medical robotics in some pathologies in order to improve the life expectancy in the worldwide population, so in the
Table II is shown the most common tools to make an appropriate patient management
3.
TABLE 2. PATIENT MANAGEMENT
Patient Management |
Question Tools |
Diagnosis |
¿How can we detect the pathology? |
Prognosis |
¿What are the implications in the pathology? |
Treatment |
¿What can we do about the pathology? |
A patient has the best opportunity for a positive health outcome when a diagnosis is made in a timely manner and accurate
4, besides, the prognosis is a prediction acording the probable outcome of an attack of disease
5, therefore, with those indicators, treatment must be the most efficient.
Everyday, thousands of patients benefit from robotic devices for either surgery or rehabilitation, examples are shown in the
Table III.
TABLE 3. PATHOLOGY MANAGEMENT WITH ROBOTICS
|
Surgical Tech |
Rehabilitation Tech |
Pathology |
Hernia |
Partial lower limbs Palsy |
Diagnosis |
Clinical /
Soft Tissue Ultrasound |
Clinical / Electromyography |
Prognosis |
Favorable |
Favorable |
Treatment |
Robotic Hernioplasty |
Exoskeletal for lower limbs |
In Latin America, medical robotics are imported from international companies to apply in healthcare, because there are not too much advanced technologies patented to create a start-up innovation project to research and develop and also the countries lack high amounts of money for financing. The first surgical robotic systems imported in Latin America were in Mexico and Brazil, so years later in 2016, surgeons made a research to analyze which specialties in robotic surgery are the most used, they were general surgery, urology and gynecology as shown in
Fig. 2.
6
Fig. 2. Robotic Surgical Procedures in Mexico – da Vinci System ®
Besides, there is a report about the percentage of disability in Latin America presented in 2006, where the country with the highest quantity of population (31.28%) with disabilities is Peru, which proves that Latin America has a low rate of high quality of rehabilitation procedures, that information is shown in
Fig. 3.
7.
Fig. 3. Values of Percentage Disability in Latin America
ROBOTICS AND BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES
A. Surgical Robotics
This technology is focuses on the area of minimally invasive applications that was established in the late 1990s, also it has teleoperated and ergonomic features. Those surgical procedures have been conducted on over 3 million patients to date
8. Surgical robotics have been receiving a wide significant attention from healthcare systems in the world and industry. It represents a radical change in the work of the operating room, turning the robot into a member of the surgical team.
When considering the robot as another member, the robot is perceived as an "intelligent robotic surgeon", with autonomy and decision-making capacity. However, it is more accurate, and closer to reality, to see the surgical robot as an "advanced surgical tool", that is, as a device placed in the hands of the surgeon that allows it to increase its capabilities, make it more precise, mitigate the fatigue problems, improve dexterity, etc. In this way the autonomy of surgical robots is very limited to certain specific tasks, while most of the time the robot is a tool that works under the tele-operated control scheme
9.
The design of surgical robot should include a risk analysis
10, because the device has contact with the human during the anesthesia stage and could be hazardous. Besides, around the world, to create the control engineering of the system is common the application of the Block Diagram as shown in
Fig. 4.
11, which gives security, accuracy, comfort and usability to the surgeon.
Fig. 4. Block Diagram of Surgical Robotic System – Control
Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is a global process that encompasses several stages; diagnosis, planning, intervention, post-operative stages. It is important to improve each of them in order to improve the overall process
12. Surgical navigation means the systems that allow the 3D localization of the different actors involved in the surgical procedure; namely, surgical tools, surgical field, and anatomical information of the patient (pre-operative or intra-operative images)
13.
Different classifications of robots could be made for surgery, depending on their control scheme (autonomous or tele-operated), or their position with respect to the patient (table-mounted-robot or patient-mounted-robot), or their mechanical architecture (serial robot, parallel or mobile robot)
14.
Worldwide, the most used robotic surgery system is the da Vinci®, it has advantages compared to laparoscopic surgery such as less loss and requirement of blood transfusion, less postoperative pain, hospital stays and shorter recovery times; at the expense of longer operative times and a higher cost compared with the laparoscopic technique
15.
In Latin America, 2018, the country which has the majority of da Vinci System® is Brazil with 37 robots, and is important to present that Peru does not have any surgical system to apply in healthcare system
15, so through this research article we want to encourage to import the surgical machine to the purpose of improve the patient management of the patient for surgery, as shown in
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Quantity of da Vinci ® Surgical Robotic System – Latin America
Around the world, there are some companies to develop surgical robotics in order to apply in specific anatomical body part, as shown in
Table IV. . In Latin America has not yet invented a surgical robot that is used directly in procedures with humans.
TABLE 4. SURGICAL ROBOTICS TECH - ANATOMICAL SECTION
Anatomy |
Companies |
Abdomen |
Intuitive Surgical |
TransEnterix |
CMR Surgical |
SS Innovations |
Neuro |
Medtronic |
Synaptive |
Zimmer |
Monteris |
Keep/Hip |
Stryker/Mako |
THINK Surgical |
Smith & Nephew |
Zimmer Biomet |
ENT |
Medrobotics |
Intuitive Surgical |
Medineering |
Galen Robotics |
Spine |
Medtronic/Mazor |
Globus Medical |
Zimmer Biomet |
NuVasive |
Eyes |
Cambridge Consultants |
Preceyes |
|
Heart |
Stereotaxis |
Heartlander Surgical |
|
|
Lungs |
J&J/Auris |
Intuitive Surgical |
|
|
Skin |
Avra Medical Robotics |
|
Urethra |
Procept BioRobotics |
|
|
|
In Perú, there is an Innovation Project named “Biomedik Surgeon ®”, developed by Eng. José Cornejo and Dr. Jorge A. Cornejo-Aguilar, as the first surgical robotic system invented in the country for training and simulation used by medical students
16, as shown in the
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Eng. José Cornejo and Biomedik Surgeon®
B. Rehabilitation and Assistive Robotics
This technology is an emerging interdisciplinary field where robotics, sensors, and feedback are used in novel ways to relearn, improve, or restore functional movements in humans. It covers walking, where the neuromuscular system orchestrates the gait, posture, and balance, also conditions such as stroke, vestibular deficits, or old age impair this important activity. Besides, robotic training, gait rehabilitation, and cooperative orthoses describe the current works in the field to address this issue, bring rehabilitation out from the clinic into the home environment, so that these medical aids are more readily available to users
17.
Rehabilitation robotics provide considerable opportunities to improve the quality of life for physically disabled people causing passive repetitive movements of the limb of the patient held by the robot, substituting or supporting the movements performed by the physiotherapist
18. So, the human-machine interface reaches its highest exponent, one these technologies are called Virtual Reality, that allows the user to interact and submerge in a computer-generated environment in a natural way
19. However, standard therapies provide only modest benefits in terms of improved mobility
20.
Worldwide, the scientists have created, using control engineering, a common standardized design of the system using the Block Diagram, as shown in
Fig. 717, which is a closed loop system that combines the force, position, velocity and acceleration with sensors and actuators coupled to orthosis or prosthesis, helping in this way to evaluate the evolution of the therapy on the patient.
Fig. 7. Block Diagram of Rehabilitation Robotic System – Control
Different classifications of robots could be made for rehabilitation, depending on end-effector-based robots and exoskeleton, those are: robots for rehabilitation of upper limb, for lower limbs and for distal extremities.
There is other concept called Assistive Robotics which is an adaptive technological device that interacts directly with the user to maintain and / or increase the functional capabilities of people, through sensors, actuators and processing
21, in order to support the patient in areas associated with psychomotor routine activities with autonomous robots and robots whose functionalities are shared with the user, used in domestic, mobility, hospitality and therapeutic purposes.
Design a robotic prosthesis and orthosis requires the combination of mechatronics, neuroscience, electrical engineering, cognitive science, signal processing, battery design, nano-technology and behavioral science
17, with the objective to enhance the recovery process and facilitate the restoration of physical function by delivering high-dose and high-intensity training.
22
Internationally, there are some med tech hubs which have created rehabilitation robots in order to improve the quality of life for patients who have suffered damage to their nervous-motor-neurological system
23, that description is shown in
Table V.
TABLE 5. REHABILITATION AND ASSISTIVE ROBOTICS TECH
Robot
|
Description
|
MySpoon
|
Allow eating with only minimal help from caregiver
|
MIT Manus
|
For physical therapy of stroke victims
|
ARMin
|
Exoskeletal Device attached to the arm
|
Anklebot
|
Exoskeletal Device attached to the leg
|
GENTLE/s
|
Robotic Assistance in Neuro and Motor Rehabilitation
|
In Perú, there is company “Biom3D”, managed by
the Eng. Cesar Martel and Eng. Carol Sandoval, which develops prosthesis for children from low-SES household and communities as a social initiative named “Manos en Acción”, as shown in
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. Biom3D ®, Manos en Acción – Arm Prosthesis
CONCLUSION
The use of medical robotics for health is very important to be able to support the patient healthcare for control the pathology using an outstanding high-level diagnosis, prognosis and treatment in order to obtain a successful recovery.
Surgery, Rehabilitation and Assistance are the main areas of robotics application in healthcare. Recently, in the last 15 years, Latin America is having access to import those latest technologies developed in North America, Europe and Asia, because there are only often innovation centers which are researching in this field. However, it is important that the countries in this part of the continent start to invest in the new affordable and efficient medical technologies in order to state new ways to give a best quality of life to the population.
The duties of the Biomedical Engineer with specialization in medical robotics are so important and indispensable because they drive the most effective tools to analyses the medical requirements proposed by the health professionals according to the patient needs, and also, they can work as a multidisciplinary team care, improving health outcomes and enhancing satisfaction of the stakeholders.
Authorship contributions: The authors participated
in the genesis of the idea, project design, collection,
information analysis and manuscript preparation
of this research paper.
Financing: Self-financed
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no
conflict of interest in the publication of this article.
Correspondence: Jorge A. Cornejo Aguilar
Address: Calle Galicia 369. Lima, Peru.
Telephone: +51 993519893
E-mail: jcornejo_17@ieee.org
1. Hu, C., Shi, Q., Liu, L., Wejinya, U., Hasegawa, Y., & Shen, Y. “Robotics in Biomedical and Healthcare Engineering”. Journal of healthcare engineering, 2017, 1610372.doi:10.1155/2017/1610372
2. Vyas, D., & Cronin, S. “Peer Review and Surgical Innovation: Robotic Surgery and Its Hurdles”. American journal of robotic surgery, 2(1), 39–44, 2015. doi:10.1166/ajrs.2015.1018
3. Wray, C. M., & Loo, L. K., “The Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Medical Uncertainty”. Journal of graduate medical education, 7(4),523–527, 2015. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-14-00638.1
4. Holmboe, Eric S., and Steven J. Durning. “Assessing Clinical Reasoning: Moving from in Vitro to in Vivo.” Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) 1 (1): 111–17, 2014.
5. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care; Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, editors. “Improving Diagnosis in Health Care”. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015 Dec 29. 2, The Diagnostic Process. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338593/
6. Ruiz Suárez, Eduardo Jafet, Rodrigo Ortiz Wong, Gamaliel Rodríguez Reyes, David Valadez Caballero, Jorge Alberto Blanco Figueroa, and Juan Roberto González Santamaría. “Experiencia Inicial En Cirugía Robótica Mínimamente Invasiva En Hospital de Tercer Nivel En México.” Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica 17 (1): 29–33, 2016.
8. Desai, Jaydev P., Rajni V. Patel, Antoine Ferreira, and Sunil Agrawal. “The Encyclopedia of Medical Robotics.” The Encyclopedia of Medical Robotics. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1142/10770-vol1.
10. Kazanzides, P., Fichtinger, G., Hager, G., Okamura, A. M., Whitcomb, L. L., & Taylor, R. H., “Surgical and interventional robotics - Core concepts, technology, and design”. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 15(2), 122-130, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2008.926390
11. Najarian, Siamak, Javad Dargahi, Goldis Darbemamieh, and Siamak Hajizadeh Farkoush. “Mechatronics in Medicine A Biomedical Engineering Approach”. 1st ed. McGraw-Hill Professional, 2011. ISBN:0071768963 9780071768962
12. Vanja Bozovic, I-Tech, “Medical Robotics”, 2008. ISBN 978-3-902613-18-9.
13. Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, I.A. Turk and E.N. Liatsikos, “Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Surgery in Urology”, Springer, 2011. ISBN 978-3-642-00890-0.
14. J. Rosen, B. Hannaford, R.M. Satava, “Surgical Robotics. Sytems Applications and Visions”. Springer, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4419-1125-4.
15. Jorge A. Cornejo-Aguilar, José Cornejo, Mariela Vargas, Raul Sebastian. “La revolución de la cirugía robótica en latino américa y la futura implementación en el sistema de salud del Perú”. [Cartas al Editor]. 2019; 19(1):108-111. (Enero 2018). DOI 10.25176/RFMH.v19.n1.1800
16. J. Cornejo, J. A. Cornejo-Aguilar and R. Palomares, "Biomedik Surgeon: Surgical Robotic System for Training and Simulation by Medical Students in Peru," 2019 International Conference on Control of Dynamical and Aerospace Systems (XPOTRON), Arequipa, Peru, 2019, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.1109/XPOTRON.2019.8705717
17. Opensurg, C. “ROBOTICA MEDICA Notas Prácticas Para El Aprendizaje de La Robótica En Bioingenierıa.” CYTED, 2013.
18. G. Bolmsjo, H. Neveryd and H. Eftring, "Robotics in rehabilitation", IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77-83. 1995. doi: 10.1109/86.372896
19. M. T Schultheis and A. A Rizzo, “The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation”, Rehabilitation Psychology 46, no. 5, 296 – 311, 2011.
20. G. Saposnik, “Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians”, Journal of the American Heart Association 42, no. 5, 1380 – 1386, 2011.
21. E Henneman and L. M. Mendell, “Functional organization of the motoneuron pool and its inputs”, Handbook of physiology: The nervous system, American Physiological Society, 423–507, 1981.
23. Laut, J., Porfiri, M., & Raghavan, P., “The Present and Future of Robotic Technology in Rehabilitation”. Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports, 4(4), 312–319, 2017. doi:10.1007/s40141-016-0139-0