INTRODUCCIÓN
The emergency service is a fundamental area in hospital operations, whose main objective is to save the patient's life or prevent disabling sequelae. It operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and in second or third level hospitals has specialized units and high resolution.
(1)
For more than two decades in the emergency service of the main hospitals in the country, the demand for medical care has increased, with stretchers persisting in passageways and long waiting times.
(2-4). This is not exclusive to a hospital or the social security system (EsSalud), but is also present in other health subsystems (ministry of health, armed forces and even in the private sector), especially in the urban area of our country.
(5)
The overcrowding of patients is one of the main problems of the emergency service, reported worldwide, influenced by many factors.
(6-9) causes can be grouped into pre, intra and post-emergency service stages. Among the pre-emergency factors, inadequate consultation stands out, with reports of up to 70%, with the most frequent causes being the patient's own initiative (or decision), no appointments in primary care, and lack of medication, related to minor diseases.
(5,10)
The main intra-emergency factors that influence overcrowding are: delay in initial care (operation of hospital triage), delay in diagnostic assistance, administration of treatment or availability of observation beds. Post-emergency factors include the availability of beds in hospital floors, other hospitals, and transportation for patient transfer.
(10)
Despite the improvements implemented in the infrastructure of several hospitals, the problem remains, so this work seeks to describe the characteristics of the demand for medical care in the adult emergency service of a tertiary social security hospital and assess its overcrowding during the first quarter of 2019.
METHODS
Observational study carried out in the adult emergency service of the National Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati Martins EsSalud (Lima-Peru), during the first quarter of 2019, not including gynecological or psychiatric emergencies. This service provides more than 160,000 services a year to people over 14 years of age.
(2)
Since 2016 the emergency service operates in a 5-level facility, using a structured 5-priority triage system (Manchester type), the patient who arrives is directed to the initial assessment area, according to their priority of care: trauma-shock unit, medical topics (priority 2 or 3), surgery, traumatology and alleviation (priority 4 or 5).
Critical care observation rooms are available for patients who are admitted: intensive (12 beds), intermediate (20 beds), chest pain (10 beds) and neurovascular (10 beds). There are also three general observation rooms with 42 beds each and a reevaluation room of 24 stretchers whose number is increased according to demand.
The service has exclusive staff, 110 emergency, internal medicine and intensive care specialists, 300 nurses and 400 nursing technicians, in addition to other health professionals such as a psychologist, social worker, nutritionist and administrative staff. It also has other specialists who work 12-hour shifts in the service (cardiologist, neurologist, nephrologist, gastroenterologist, surgeon, anesthesiologist and traumatologist) and other specialties that come by inter-consultation.
The admission and triage of the patient were carried out in computerized systems, as well as the entry and exit to the different areas of the emergency service. Diagnostic tests were carried out in separate computer systems. However, records of medical care, nursing, procedures, inter-consultation responses, and pharmacy were performed manually (handwritten on paper).
The institutional statistical system was revised, selecting all attentions between 1 January and 31 March 2019. Sociodemographic variables, arrival time, area of care, destination and main emergency indicators were evaluated. Data were coded and processed in Microsoft excel 2010. Descriptive statistical analysis and comparative graphs were performed in IBM SPSS 24.0. Good research practice principles were followed with permission from the head of the service.
RESULTS
During the first quarter of 2019, 51294 patients aged between 14 and 102 years (median 60) were treated, 56.7% were female. 18% of patients registered two or more visits during the trimester evaluated. The number of daily attentions is shown in
Figure 1, by topic of attention in
Figure 2 and the number of attentions per hour and priority are shown in
Figure 3. The services classified as priority III (31161) and IV (10684) totaled 42845, corresponding to 83.5% of the total of services in this period.
The most frequent diagnoses after initial care (CIE-10 code registered in the institutional system) were: abdominal pain 7.2%, urinary tract infection 5.1%, acute diarrhea 4.4%, low back pain 4.1%, acute pharyngitis 2.7% and headache 2.3%; The rest corresponded to more than 20 less frequent pathologies. There were 422 deaths (0.8% of total care), 391 surgeries (0.7%) and 69 transfers (0.1%).
There were 6683 admissions to observation rooms of the service (13% of total attendance). Female 50.2% and median age 65 years. 13% of patients admitted had two or more emergency admissions during the trimester evaluated. The most frequent diagnoses of patients admitted to emergency observation rooms were respiratory failure 7.6%, sepsis 6.1%, urinary tract infection 4.1%, stroke 4.0%, abdominal pain 3.1%, and pneumonia 2.4%.
From the total admissions, it corresponded to the re-evaluation room 43%, observation 45.7%, intermediate care 3.4%, neurovascular chest pain 7.6% and intensive care 0.3% respectively. 80% of patients in the intensive and intermediate care rooms were on invasive mechanical ventilation and inotropic support.
The daily flow of patients is presented in
Table 1, of which the reevaluation room (of 24 emergency beds) extends to the passageways of the second floor, increasing its capacity up to 3 or 4 times. The destination of patients to the emergency patient care center is shown in
Figure 4. The average stay and mortality per ward are shown in
Table 2. The average overall stay in observation rooms of the emergency service was 5.7 days and its overall mortality was 9%.
Figure 1. Number of daily visits by day of the week in the emergency service of an urban hospital, January-March 2019.
Figure 2. Percentage of attentions according to topic of admission to the emergency service of an urban hospital, January-March 2019.
Figure 3. Number of attentions according to priority of care and time of arrival at the emergency service of urban hospital, January-March 2019.
Table 1. Daily flow of patients admitted to observation rooms of the emergency department of an urban hospital, January-March 2019.
EMERGENCY UNIT |
N° |
ENTRY DAILY |
DISCHARGE DAILY |
|
Beds |
Of Topics |
Other room |
Discharges |
Hospital |
Reevaluation room |
24-80 |
21 |
1 |
10 |
5 |
Observation medicine |
84 |
14 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
Observation surgery |
40 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
Intensive care |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
- |
<1 |
Intermediate care |
20 |
2 |
1 |
- |
<1 |
Neurovascular chest pain |
20 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
Figure 4. Destination of patients admitted to observation rooms of the emergency department of an urban hospital, January-March 2019.
Table 2. Stay and mortality by observation rooms of the emergency service of an urban hospital, January-March 2019.
EMERGENCY UNIT |
N° BEDS |
STAY (DAYS)* |
MORTALITY (%)** |
REEVALUATION ROOM |
24-80 |
4,4 |
1 |
OBSERVATION MEDICINE |
84 |
5,9 |
16 |
OBSERVATION SURGERY |
40 |
7,0 |
6 |
INTENSIVE CARE |
14 |
12,6 |
37 |
INTERMEDIATE CARE |
20 |
9,5 |
66 |
NEUROVASCULAR CHEST PAIN |
20 |
5,3 |
2 |
* Average stay in days, ** % of total patients per room.
DISCUSSION
The over demand for care and overcrowding of patients is maintained in the emergency service of Rebagliati hospital, with high frequency in the morning hours, higher on Mondays and with a significant decrease on Sundays, similar to previous reports in local and other places in Latin America.
(2,11-13) despite having a new infrastructure in our specific case.
The focus is on priorities III and IV, topics of medicine and alleviation similar to 2015.
(2) The percentage of attentions that corresponded to "non-emergencies" was similar to what was reported by the ombudsman's office in 2016.
(14) It is noteworthy that almost a fifth of patients come more than once in this trimester, a fact not previously reported in our country, but which was a reality.
Returning patients correspond to patients who complete outpatient parenteral treatment; Patients referred for invasive procedures that for lack of outpatient supply is satisfied that demand for patient safety, patients with indication to return to their respective appointments for diagnostic help. Inappropriate uses of emergency services, also reported elsewhere.
(13,15)
The demand for care in the emergency service is predominantly in elderly patients (50% are over 60 years old) with a slight predominance of females, for very diverse care reasons, reflecting the effects of the epidemiological transition and problems in the primary level of care in the national social security.
(2,11,12) also reported in other countries, where the decompensation of chronic diseases is a cause of frequent use.
(13)
Regarding mortality at emergency admission, 0.8% of the total number of visits was reported, similar to what was reported in 2015, less than 2%, which is indicated by the technical standard of the local ministry of health.
(1,2) A low proportion of surgical interventions was reported 0.7% of the attentions, influenced by the high frequency of non-emergency attentions.
The very low transfer rate (0.1%) is noteworthy, assuming that the majority of procedures performed in highly complex facilities should be performed in less complex facilities. This is due to the lack of resolution capacity in other health facilities, where there is no 24-hour emergency consultation, lack of staff and inpatient facilities. But it is also influenced by the direct demand of users who do not go to the first level of care as well as the references made to our emergency without coordinating or considering the complexity of the patient.
Were admitted to observation rooms 13% of attentions, lower than 2015, however 13% had more than one admission in a single quarter (more than half of 21% per year reported in 2015 and also higher than 2012 in the same service).
(2,3) This indicates that a lower proportion of attentions are being hospitalized, but with greater recurrence, making use of various mechanisms such as outpatient intravenous treatments, invasive diagnostic procedures (radiology, pneumology or gastroenterology) in order to reduce stay and overcrowding in the emergency, but also represent inadequate hospitalizations.
(16)
The average stay in reevaluation rooms was 4 days and sometimes there were up to 84 stretchers in the passageways. This is in line with what the ombudsman's office said in its report on the state of emergency of Lima 2016, where it mentions institutionalization of the corridor, overcrowding and permanence of more than 12 hours. It corresponds to a problem of the entire health system and not just of a hospital service.
(14)
The medical and surgical observation rooms shelter patients mainly for problems that are no longer emergency with a stay of 6 to 7 days, with a high percentage of discharge at home. This means that emergency observation rooms have been converted into inpatient rooms for other medical and surgical services, where treatments and diagnostic studies are completed due to lack of beds in other hospital services. It could also express the need for more hospital beds for complex and chronic patients (long-stay units).
The overall mortality of patients admitted to the emergency department is low (9% of patients admitted), but when comparing the different wards, there are large differences. A special case is the intermediate room with high mortality rates, but behind which are important factors such as previous situation of patients (often with terminal chronic illness in a situation of last days or agony) or stay critically ill patients due to lack of beds in intensive care units.
This study does not evaluate waiting times for patient care or delay in hospitalization due to lack of beds, as reported by a study of overcrowding of emergency services in Colombia and others in our country
(4,11,17); However, the number of patients (especially in the re-evaluation room) and the prolonged stay in emergency confirm the overcrowding that has been occurring for more than a decade and has to do with the entire health system
(2,3).
Among the main limitations of the study are that it was conducted in a single hospital during three months of the year, the data were recorded by non-medical personnel asynchronously, the diagnoses are not uniform and part of the care was not recorded electronically. Another limitation was not to use scales to quantify crowding, but as previously reported they always result in the highest score.
(4) However, what has been reported is an important contribution and could represent the reality of other hospitals with similar characteristics nationwide.
It is concluded that the demand to the emergency service of the hospital evaluated is mainly due to medical problems (priority 3 and 4), predominantly elderly and female patients. 13% were admitted with prolonged stay, low mortality, very few transfers, high rate of return and insufficient supply of hospital beds. The over demand for care and overcrowding of patients persist.
Authorship contributions: The authors participate in the genesis of the idea, project design, data collection and interpretation, analysis of results and preparation of the manuscript of the present research work.
Financing: Self-financed
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the publication of this article.
Received: February 04, 2020
Approved: March 20, 2020
Correspondence: Jose Amado Tineo.
Address: Jr. Belisario Flores 328 Dpto 301. Lince, Lima-Peru.
Telephone: +1990452547
Email: jpamadot@gmail.com; jamadot@unmsm.edu.pe
1. Ministerio de salud. Norma Técnica de los Servicios de Emergencia de Hospitales del Sector Salud [Internet]. Lima-Perú; 2004.
2. Vásquez Alva R, Amado Tineo J, Ramírez Calderón F, Velásquez Velásquez R, Huari Pastrana R. Sobredemanda de atención médica en el servicio de emergencia de adultos de un hospital terciario, Lima, Perú. An Fac Med. 2016; 77(4):379-384. DOI: 10.15381/anales.v77i4.12654.
4. Taype-Huamani W, Chucas-Ascencio L, Amado-Tineo J. Hacinamiento del servicio de emergencia de adultos de un hospital urbano: Reporte de caso. Rev med Rebagliati. 2018;1(2):50–55.
5. Ponce Varillas TI. Hacinamiento en los servicios de emergencia. An Fac med. 2017;78(2):218-223. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/ anales.v78i2.13221.
6. Hsu N-C, Shu C-C, Lin Y-F, Yang M-C, Su S, Ko W-J. Why do general medical patients have a lengthy wait in the emergency department before admission? J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Aug;113(8):557–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.08.005
7. Smith J, Keating L, Flowerdew L, O’Brien R, McIntyre S, Morley R, et al. An Emergency Medicine Research Priority Setting Partnership to establish the top 10 research priorities in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J. 2017;34(7):454–456. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206702
8. Hsu CM, Liang LL, Chang Y Te, Juang WC. Emergency department overcrowding: Quality improvement in a Taiwan Medical Center. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118(1P1):186–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.03.008
9. Giunta DH, Pedretti AS, Elizondo CM, Grande Ratti MF, González Bernaldo de Quiros F, Waisman GD, et al. Descripción de las características del fenómeno Crowding en la Central de Emergencia de Adultos, en un hospital universitario de alta complejidad: estudio de cohorte retrospectiva. Rev Med Chil. 2017;145(5):557–563. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872017000500001.
10. Wang Z, Xiong X, Wang S, Yan J, Springer M, Dellinger RP. Causes of Emergency Department Overcrowding and Blockage of Access to Critical Services in Beijing: A 2-Year Study. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(5):665–673. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.02.009.
11. Taype-Huamaní W, Chucas-Ascencio L, Cruz-Rojas L De, Amado-Tineo J. Tiempo de espera para atención médica urgente en un hospital terciario después de implementar un programa de mejora de procesos. An Fac Med. 2019;80(4):438–442. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/anales.v80i4.16705.
12. Taype-Huamaní W, Rojas-De la Cruz L, Miranda-Soler D, Amado-Tineo J. Características de la demanda no urgente en el Servicio de Emergencia de un hospital de la Seguridad Social en el Perú. Rev la Fac Med Humana. 2020;20(1):45–51. DOI: 10.25176/RFMH.v20i1.2544.
14. Defensoría del Pueblo. El derecho a la salud: Los servicios de emergencia en los establecimientos de salud públicos y el acceso a medicamentosesenciales. Lima-Perú; 2016.
17. Restrepo-Zea JH, Jaén-Posada JS, Espinal JJ, Zapata PA. Saturación en los servicios de urgencias: análisis de cuatro hospitales de Medellín y simulación de estrategias. Rev Gerenc Polít Salud. 2017; 17(34): 1-17. DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.rgps17-34.ssua