ARTICULO ORIGINAL
REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA HUMANA 2021 - Universidad Ricardo Palma
1 Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Santa Fe, Argentina.
2 Cardiofood Lifestyle Medicine. Buenos Aires, Argentina
3 Harvard Medical School. Massachusetts, Estados Unidos
4 Universidad Ricardo Palma. Lima, Perú.
5 Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
6 CETEC S.R.L, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
7 Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
a Health Coach, Professor of Natural Cooking and CHEF Coaching Program
b Cardiologist, Nephrologist and Arterial Hypertension specialist
c Bioengineer
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The changes in daily routines as a result of the mitigating measures implemented in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic represent a challenge for the Latin American population to preserve their general well-being. Objective: To evaluate the wellness assessment from the lifestyle medicine program Cardiofood Lifestyle in virtual modality in Latin American participants during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Methods: Analytical, retrospective and descriptive study, with a quantitative approach; developed in virtual mode between May and December 2020. The population sample was 51 participants. A subjective assessment questionnaire and a self-authorship wellness score were applied and validated by a hypothesis test. The P value equal to zero is calculated. Results: Of 51 participants, 44 (86%) were women with a mean age of 45 and 7 (14%) were men with a mean age of 40 years. The mean of the evaluation test of the Cardiofood Lifestyle program was 4.71. 35 (68.62%) participants felt more energetic; 46 (90%) expressed feeling much more secure in choosing healthy foods; 36 (70.58%) felt much more lucid and 41 (80.40%) stated that they felt much healthier compared to the beginning of the program. Conclusions: There is a good subjective wellness assessment represented in Latin American participants of the Cardiofood Lifestyle medicine program in virtual mode during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, represented in better sensations of energy, lucidity, ability to make food choices and health.
Keywords: lifestyle, feeding behavior, quality of life, coronavirus infections, health promotion, chronic disease (Source : MeSH - NLM).
RESUMEN
Introducción: Los cambios en las rutinas cotidianas como resultado de las medidas mitigantes implementadas frente a la pandemia de COVID-19 representan un desafío para la población latinoamericana para conservar su bienestar general. Objetivo: Evaluar la valoración del bienestar a partir del programa de medicina de estilo de vida Cardiofood Lifestyle en modalidad virtual en participantes latinoamericanos durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en 2020. Métodos: Estudio analitico, restrospectivo y descriptivo, con enfoque cuantitativo; desarrollado en modalidad virtual entre mayo y diciembre del 2020. La muestra poblacional fue de 51 participantes. Se aplicó un cuestionario de valoración subjetiva y un score de bienestar de propias autorías validadas por un test de hipótesis. Se calcula el valor P igual a cero. Resultados: De 51 particiantes, 44 (86%) fueron mujeres con una edad media de 45 y 7 (14%) hombres con una media de edad de 40 años. La media del test de valoración del programa Cardiofood Lifestyle fue de 4,71. 35 (68,62%) participantes se sintieron con más energía; 46 (90%) expresaron sentirse mucho más seguros en la elección de alimentos saludables; 36 (70,58%) se sintieron con mucha más lucidez y 41 (80,40%) manifestaron sentirse mucho más saludables en comparación al comienzo del programa. Conclusiones: Existe una buena valoración subjetiva del bienestar representado en participantes latinoamericanos del programa de medicina de estilo de vida Cardiofood Lifestyle en modalidad virtual durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en 2020, representado en mejores sensaciones de energía, lucidez, capacidad de elecciones de alimentos y salud.
Palabras Clave: estilo de vida, conducta alimentaria, calidad de vida, infecciones por coronavirus, promoción de la salud, enfermedad crónica (Fuente: DeCS BIREME).
INTRODUCTION
Conserving a healthy lifestyle and maintaining well-being has become a challenge after the appearance of
COVID-19 disease and the subsequent worldwide pandemic. Local authorities of different countries in
Latin America have implemented a variety of mitigating measures that include isolation, social
distancing, quarantine in phases, hygiene measures, etc. (1) which has
represented a challenge for the people of this region to conserve their health. (2, 3)
COVID-19 pandemic has been installed within another pre-existing pandemic: the pandemic of
non-transmissible chronic disease, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease, arterial hypertension, and cancer (1-5). In
the Region of the Americas, there are 5.5 million deaths due to this cause per year. (6)
These conditions together with advanced age constitute a greater risk for those who develop
COVID-19. Therefore, maintaining and improving integral health and wellbeing through lifestyle medicine
(LM), defined as the practice of prescribing healthy habits based on scientific evidence (7, 8), is
constituted as singular importance in health promotion, since it focuses on the origin and root of
non-transmissible chronic disease risk factors (8, 10). Successful documented experiences exist
regarding LM intervention programs, such as the Ornish Program (11) and CHIP
Program (12) but they are based on cultural standards particularly from
population samples corresponding to North American culture.
When facing the problem described, we recognize this void in the field of Lifestyle Medicine,
given the lack of therapeutic intervention research in this field with respect to cultural context and
particularly from Latin America. For all the before mentioned, it is necessary to develop research from
a Lifestyle Medicine approach that considers the population characteristics of this region.
Consequently, the objective of this study is to evaluate the subjective assessment from the LM program
called Cardiofood Lifestyle in virtual mode in Latin American participants.
METHODS
Design and area of study
We performed a retrospective and descriptive study with quantitative focus, and it was carried out in virtual mode for participants of diverse countries in Latin America.
Population and sample
A total of 51 answers were obtained from the completed forms from the first cohort of the Cardiofood Lifestyle Program. All the subjects are from Latin American precedence, of different countries, including Chile, Argentina, Peru, Uruguay, Paraguay, Colombia, Venezuela, Mexico, and immigrants living in the United States. We need to emphasize that the sample was not representative of the general population, however, the results obtained allow us to generate conclusions regarding the program participants.
Variables and instruments
In order to evaluate the subjective wellness assessment from the Cardiofood Program, we applied an assessment questionnaire and experience evaluation and subjective results, which we call “Request for Testimony and Feedback “(Table 1), through Google Forms. Since the virtual mode adopted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the inability to collect laboratory data and clinical parameters, we decided to adopt a subjective evaluation questionnaire of self-authorship with the purpose of evaluating wellness results. These results were evaluated through a score that quantifies the obtained results in the applications.
Table 1. Request for Testimony and Feedback
1. Compared to when you began the program, how confident do you feel about your power to control and lose weight and not gain it back and improving your lifestyle? | ||||
Much more confident | More or less confident | Same | Less confident | Much less confident |
2. Compared to when you began the program, how much energy do you have now? | ||||
Much more energy | A little more energy | More or less the same | A little less energy | Much less energy |
3. Compared to when you began the program, how confident do you feel on your capacity to choose health food options? | ||||
Much more confident | More or less confident | Same | Less confident | Much less confident |
4. Compared to when you began the program, what level of mental lucidity would you say you currently possess? | ||||
Much more lucid | A little more lucid | More or less the same | A little less lucid | Much less lucid |
5. Compared to when you began the program, how healthy do you currently feel? | ||||
Much healthier | A little healthier | More or less the same | A little less healthy | Much unhealthier |
6. Have you lost weight since you began the program? | ||||
Yes | No | Not sure | ||
7. If you lost weight, how many kg exactly? | ||||
Open answer | ||||
8. What did the Cardiofood program mean to you? Why? | ||||
Open answer |
To obtain the quantitative score, we included questions 1 to 6 in the ”Request for Testimony and Feedback “. The answers were translated to numerical values between 1 and 5 (question 6, having only 3 answer options, used only values 1, 3, and 5 to keep the scale). Questions 7 and 8 correspond to open questions, therefore, they were removed from the score. The wellness score was calculated adding the values of the answers of each participant, then dividing the result of the sum by 6, which is the number of questions included (Table 5). The instruments were elaborated by the authors and validated on a qualitative level through expert judgment.
Procedures
Data collection was carried out between the months of May and December 2020, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. IN order to obtain results, we applied an online questionnaire with the Google Forms platform, through a link sent to the program participants, prior to the finalization of this. Likewise, we explained to the participants the importance of completing it with the objective of studying the obtained results.
Statistical analysis
After the data collection, these Will be entered into a database created in the Microsoft Excel 2010 program. Qualitative values were presented as frequencies and percentages and ofr the quantitative variables mean and standard deviation.
Ethical aspects
The ethical principles from the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association were respected. Prior to the application of collection instruments and participation in the Cardiofood Lifestyle Program we considered the virtual informed consent acceptance, sent in the beginning of the same and signed promptly.
RESULTS
Regarding the characteristics of the participants in this study, 44 (86%) were women between 30 and 65
years and 7 (14%) of the remainder of the total sample were men of 45 years as average age, all from
different countries in Latin America, among them Chile, Argentina, Peru, Uruguay, Paraguay, Colombia,
Venezuela, Mexico, and immigrants living in the United States.
The subjective assessment on confidence in the management of body weight resulted in 46 (90%) of
the sample feeling more confident. When analyzing the subjective assessment on weight loss, 40 (78,43%)
of the sample expressed having lost weight. The quantitative evaluation of weight loss according to
individual measures of participants in their homes after having participated during 8 weeks of the
program, gave the following results: 29.41% (15) of the sample lost 3 kg,
21.56% (11) 2 kg, 9.80% (5) lost 2.5 kilos. (Table 2)
Table 2. Subjective assessment of confidence in weight control, weight loss, kg lost after completing the Cardiofood Lifestyle Program (N=51)
Compared to when you began the program, how confident do you feel in controlling and losing weight and not gaining it back again and improve your lifestyle? | ||
Assessment | Frequency | Percentage |
Much more confident | 46 | 90% |
More or less confident | 5 | 10% |
Same confidence | 0 | 0 |
Less confident | 0 | 0 |
Much less confident | 0 | 0 |
Did you lose weight since you began the program? | ||
Assessment | Frequency | Percentage |
Yes | 40 | 78,43% |
No | 8 | 15,68% |
I’m not sure | 3 | 5,88% |
If you lost weight, exactly how many kg? | ||
Did not lose weight | 5 | 9,80% |
1 kilo | 3 | 5,88% |
2 kilos | 11 | 21,56% |
2,5 kilos | 5 | 9,80% |
3 kilos | 15 | 29,41% |
3,5 kilos | 2 | 3,92% |
4 kilos | 4 | 7,84% |
5 kilos | 2 | 3,92% |
6 kilos | 1 | 1,96% |
8 kilos | 3 | 5,88% |
Analyzing the level of energy, 35 (68,62%) of the sample felt more energy compared to when they began
the program. The subjective assessment of mental lucidity gave a result of 36 (70,58%) of the sample.
(Table 3)
Regarding the subjective assessment of selection capacity of healthy food options, 46 (90%) of
the sample expressed feeling much more confident, while 5 (10%) manifested feeling more or less
confident with respect to it. (Table 4) When referring to the subjective
assessment of health after completing the program, 41 (80.40%) manifested feeling much healthier and 10
(19.60%) expressed feeling somewhat healthier. (Table 4)
On the other hand, the wellness mean of the Cardiofood Lifestyle program is above 3, with an
average evaluation of 4.71. In (Table 5), the scores of each participant can be
seen.
Table 3. Subjective assessment of energy level and mental lucidity after completing the Cardiofood Lifestyle program (N=51)
Compared to when you began the program, how much energy do you have now? | ||
Assessment | Frequency | Percentage |
Much more energy | 35 | 68,62 |
A Little more energy | 14 | 27,45 |
More or les the same | 2 | 3,92 |
A Little less energy | 0 | 0 |
Much less energy | 0 | 0 |
Compared to when you began the program, what level of mental lucidity would you say you currently have? | ||
Assessment | Frequency | Percentage |
Much more lucid | 36 | 70,58 |
A little more lucid | 9 | 17,64 |
More or less the same | 6 | 11,76 |
A little less lucid | 0 | 0 |
Much less lucid | 0 | 0 |
Source: Testimony Request Cardiofood Lifestyle Program |
Table 4. Subjective assessment on confidence in the selection capacity of healthy food choices and subjective assessment of health after completing the Cardiofood Lifestyle Program (N=51)
Compared to when you began the program, how confident do you feel in your ability to select healthy food options? | ||
Assessment | Frequency | Percentage |
Much more confidente | 46 | 90 |
More or less confident | 5 | 10 |
Same level of confidence | 0 | 0 |
Less confident | 0 | 0 |
Much less confident | 0 | 0 |
Compared to when you began the program, how healthy do you currently feel? | ||
Assessment | Frequency | Percentage |
Much healthier | 41 | 80,40 |
A little healthier | 10 | 19,60 |
More or less the same | 0 | 0 |
A little less healthier | 0 | 0 |
MMuch less healthier | 0 | 0 |
Source: Testimony Request Cardiofood Lifestyle Program |
Table 5. Score table on Wellbeing of each participant in the Cardiofood Lifestyle Program (N=51)
SUBJECT | FINAL SCORE OF ALL ANSWERS | SCORE |
---|---|---|
1 | 29.0 | 4.83 |
2 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
3 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
4 | 29.0 | 4.83 |
5 | 27.0 | 4.50 |
6 | 27.0 | 4.50 |
7 | 29.0 | 4.83 |
8 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
9 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
10 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
11 | 26.0 | 4.33 |
12 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
13 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
14 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
15 | 22.0 | 3.67 |
16 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
17 | 25.0 | 4.17 |
18 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
19 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
20 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
21 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
22 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
23 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
24 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
25 | 29.0 | 4.83 |
26 | 26.0 | 4.33 |
27 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
28 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
29 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
30 | 23.0 | 3.83 |
31 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
32 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
33 | 27.0 | 4.50 |
34 | 25.0 | 4.17 |
35 | 27.0 | 4.50 |
36 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
37 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
38 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
39 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
40 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
41 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
42 | 26.0 | 4.33 |
43 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
44 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
45 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
46 | 30.0 | 5.00 |
47 | 26.0 | 4.33 |
48 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
49 | 25.0 | 4.17 |
50 | 26.0 | 4.33 |
51 | 28.0 | 4.67 |
DISCUSSION
Following the North American College of Lifestyle Medicine and the Latin American Society of Lifestyle
Medicine, Lifestyle Medicine (LM) can be defined as an evidence-based approach the seeks to prevent,
treat, and even reverse diseases by replacing harmful behaviors for other beneficial ones, such as how
to eat healthier, being physically active, stress relief, avoiding abuse of toxic substances, adequate
sleep, and having a solid emotional support system, through 6 fundamental pillars, we are able to
organize, set health objectives fo the patients, and convert them into active and responsible agents
when thinking about their well-being. (14,15)
The intervention programs in lifestyle medicine, such as the Ornish Program (11) and CHIP Program (12) are based on cultural
standards particular to population samples corresponding to North American culture. The Cardiofood
Lifestyle Program proposed to unite the knowledge acquired about LM and health coaching in the stages
that preceded the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of the knowledge in effectiveness of LM programs dosed
in at least an 8-week period, we decided to experiment implementing these recommendations adapted to the
Latin American population with their cultural characteristics and needs in the moment of the COVID-19
pandemic. Using education in healthy eating, a plant-based integral nutrition, as a main focus (1,16), during the sessions the participants gained knowledge
to prevent, control and improve non-transmissible chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease,
obesity, diabetes, cancer, and risk factors of COVID-19 (1,4 ,5). Additionally, they feel healthier,
more lucid, with more energy, and part of a group, guided and contents. (1,17-20)
Maintaining an adequate weight during the COVID-19 pandemic was a challenge with the subsequent
increase in risk factors of getting this disease (1). During the Cardiofood
Lifestyle Program, we urged participants to follow a low caloric density food pattern that generates
great satiety, which offers a solution to weight loss and management. (1).
This eating pattern was associated to a decrease of cardiovascular diseases and cancer (1,21), reduction in inflammation and oxidative stress (1,22), diversity in intestinal microbiota due to the presence
of fibers and polyphenols and regulation of the immune system. (1,22,23) The selection of healthy foods and confidence in this
aspect constituted a central factor in well-being, resulting in 90% of positive assessment.
Regarding energy and lucidity of people during COVID-19, the preliminary reports have shown that
people presented with a reduction in the average step count which fluctuates between 7% and 38% in all
the countries. (1,24). Insufficient physical activity is one
of the main risk factors of death in the world, as well as a key risk factor for at least 35 ailments
(25), including cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes. (1,26,27) During the Program, physical activity
was supported through the incorporation of courtesy yoga classes and a recommendation of counting their
steps daily, with the aim of reaching 10.000 by the end of the program. These recommendations resulted
in an assessment of 68,62% of greater energy and 70,58% of greater lucidity of the sample.
These results reveal a very promising prognosis for the development and implementation of
therapeutic intervention group programs in virtual mode of Latin Americans that have the need to eat
healthier, feel more energized, lucidity and wellness. Fundamentally, we evidence that therapeutic
education of the participants (1) during the program was able to improve their
subjective assessment on health.
Regarding healthy relationships, scientific evidence holds that authentic social interactions,
including brief one, have positive effects on longevity and general health. (1,28) According to a study by Grant & Glueck, healthy social connections are
considered the most important predictor of happiness and longevity. Connectivity could activate the
parasympathetic nervous system, reducing stress, and its dangerous consequences (1,17,29),. During COVID-19, social distancing
was a very important recommendation to control infections and help save lives. In the Cardiofood
Lifestyle Program, through weekly meetings of 1 hour and 15 minutes, the opening of an exclusive
Facebook group created emotional support, through social interactions, Health Coaching sessions (19,20) and virtual contact, such as is evidenced in the
Wellness score results.
Therefore, we recommend moving forward with Lifestyle Medicine interventions and education for
the Latin American population, with the goal of promoting specific actions geared towards improving
healthy food choices, energy, and well-being withing the COVID-19 pandemic and non-transmissible chronic
diseases.
Our study limitations have been, in the first place, that the online questionnaire may have
generated response bias, however, we used an easy to use self-administered standardized instrument. We
must mention that the total participation was of 120 people in the Cardiofood Lifestyle Program and only
51 completed the questionnaire. For future interventions, specific strategies will be evaluated to make
this action more effective, for example carry it out in session 8 before finishing the program.
Likewise, due to the virtual mode adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, it was not possible to gather
laboratory data and clinical parameters that could be effectively evaluated from a distance. Despite
these limitations, we consider that he research provides important information.
CONCLUSION
We found a good subjective wellness evaluation from the LM program called Cardiofood Lifestyle in virtual mode in Latin American participants. In face of this, it is important to develop therapeutic intervention programs in lifestyle medicine for this population sample with the goal to improve wellbeing of people within the context of the COVID-19 world pandemic marked within the pandemic of non-transmissible chronic diseases.
Authorship contributions: The authors participated in the genesis of the idea, project
design, data collection and interpretation, results analysis and manuscript preparation of this
research work.
Funding sources: Self-financed.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare not having conflicts of interest.
Received: September 30, 2021
Approved: November 9, 2021
Correspondence: Gabriel Hernan Lapman
Address: Wenseslao tata 4726 caseros, 3 de febrero, Argentina.
Telephone number: +54 9 11 5307-6341
E-mail: drlapman@gmail.com