INTRODUCTION
The Peruvian population has undergone a sociodemographic transition with a decrease in the mortality
rate, a larger economically active population, and population aging, with a greater presentation of
chronic-degenerative diseases to the detriment of infectious diseases
(1). Among
this group of now frequent diseases are dorsopathies, located in a sixth place of morbidity for outpatient
consultation, with 3.2%, and which occurs in all stages of adult life: 2.4% in young adults, 5.6% in adults
and 6.9% in older adults, and even in teenagers, with 1.3%, a situational context that had not occurred in
recent decades
(2).
In this way, an adequate evaluation of the spine is of utmost importance, especially at the level of
the lumbosacral spine, since in this region there is greater symptomatology, being the objective of clinical
and especially radiological review because it is the most useful diagnostic. Currently, magnetic resonance
images stand out for allowing the visualization of anatomical information at the spinal and vertebral level
with high contrast resolution, having as a fundamental part the T2-weighted image sequence that demonstrates
the differentiation between cerebrospinal fluid with the other structures of the vertebromedullary region.
Therefore, it has a sensitivity and specificity of 85.5%, close to 100% in oncological and inflammatory
pathology
(3,4).
However, traditionally the clinical and especially radiological evaluation of the spine in general
has been limited to the region that is presumed to be affected by various limitations, despite the fact that
not all pathological types will affect a single region, such as herniated discs with a greater lumbosacral
settlement, spondyloarthropathies in the lower back with the likelihood of involvement in adjacent segments,
and others that are clinically silent such as vertebral hemangiomas, located mainly at the dorsal level but
also at other levels
(5,6).
Based on this, some method is required to visualize the total spine, such as the panoramic sequence
or also called panoramic image, which makes it possible to see the spine in a single sequence with modern
magnetic resonance imaging systems. This allows the acquisition of images in the sagittal plane of the
entire axis of the spine, taking only a few additional minutes compared to the traditional examination,
without the need for repositioning the patient, and only planning it from the acquisition station in the MRI
Scanning Room, where the acquisition time will vary according to each sequence
(7,8).
The technique is based on a direct application of the Composing Software, which allows to show an
image resulting from other sequences that were acquired in advance. This was traditionally only done in a
later post-processing of images, but now it can be obtained automatically by pre-planning the sequences of
interest in alignment with what your acquisitions are achieved with the composite image minutes later. This
possibility means a notable optimization in terms of the use of extra time and additional platform for image
post-processing
(8,9).
Considering that the T2 sequence is a pattern and a basic part of any study of the spinal cord, the
fact of using a panoramic sequence enhanced in T2 would be of great contribution and utility to the usual
study of the lumbosacral spine; this is because it would allow additional information to be obtained.
Therefore, its analysis would serve as a recommendation to opt for its performance due to its contribution
and benefit in the diagnosis. In view of this, the objective was to analyze the application of this sequence
for the study of the lumbosacral spine by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS
Study design
A retrospective and cross-sectional study was carried out, from January to June 2016, in a group of
adult patients whose ages were between 18 and 60 years of age. An MRI study of the lumbosacral spine from an
outpatient consultation at a private health services institution in Lima was performed.
Population and sample
The population was made up of 357 patients who had MRI of the lumbosacral spine, whose sample was obtained
with the proper formula for a finite population:
In the formula, a prevalence equivalent to 0.5 was considered, with a precision of 0.05 and a significance
level of 0.05, resulting in a sample of n = 186 cases. The applied sampling was stratified probabilistic,
whose criterion was to consider the life stages included in the cases, both young adults aged 18-30 years
and adults properly speaking aged 31-60 years. The population comprised 71 young adults and 286 adults, with
which 37 cases of young adults and 149 cases of adults were selected under the same degree of
proportionality, all randomly assigned, thus making up 186 cases of the total sample.
Collection and evaluation instrument
A collection sheet was applied, consisting of a general sheet and an analytical sheet, the data of
which were filled in considering the request for a radiological study and the examination performed
respectively, using the systematic observation technique. The first sheet allows collecting basic data such
as gender and stage of life of the patient, as well as the diagnostic presumption to perform the
examination, and the second sheet collects if findings were presented and in which pathological groups and
subgroups they could be classified. The examinations were carried out on a Siemens MAGNETOM Aera 1.5 Tesla
MRI scanner, using the Spine 32 antennas (attached to the equipment table) and Body 18 (placed at the
abdominal level referring to the lumbosacral spine), in which the study was acquired specific in its usual
form as well as panoramic T2 Sequence using just an additional 3:37 minutes.
Statistical analysis
A data matrix was prepared using the Microsoft Excel 2016 software for the corresponding
collection, creating contingency tables with a subsequent verification of the data obtained. For processing,
the statistical software R for Windows, Version 3.1.2, was used, making the corresponding frequency
distribution for the different findings and allowing the calculation of means and trends. Likewise, the
normal distribution was verified in the data obtained by means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and with this
apply the hypothesis test for a proportion, considering:
- Null hypothesis (H0): The acquisition of the panoramic T2 Sequence in the lumbosacral
spine does not allow 50% more findings to be located in contrast to a routine examination.
- Alternative hypothesis (H1): The acquisition of the panoramic T2 Sequence in the
lumbosacral spine does allow 50% more findings to be located in contrast to a routine examination.
Ethical aspects
The study was carried out based on ethical considerations and good practices, with the
authorization of the Academic and Research Directorate of Clínica Internacional, from whose San Borja
headquarters the radiological examinations were obtained after coordination with the headquarters of the
Center for Diagnostic Imaging and Supervision of the Magnetic Resonance Area, respecting the confidentiality
of the information collected for the exclusive use of this investigation.
RESULTS
The ages of the patients who had magnetic resonance imaging ranged from 18 to 60 years and the
median achieved was 40 years. Reviewing the selected cases based on life stage, adults themselves (from 31
to 60 years) were 80.1%, while young adults (from 18 to 30 years) represented 19.9%. Likewise, the female
gender constituted 53.8% and the male gender 46.2%, and in which total of cases the most frequent diagnostic
presumption was the herniated discs, with 52.7%.
In general, of 186 examinations in total, there were 5 cases that presented a normal diagnosis in
the traditional study and with the application of panoramic T2 sequence. Therefore, the remaining 181 cases
had some finding, regardless of the acquired segment of the spine. Of these 181 mentioned, the usual
lumbosacral study had a total of 414 findings.
In the lumbosacral spine, degenerative pathologies were seen as the most frequent findings,
occurring in 93% of cases. Of these, herniated discs were the most common with 57%, the majority of which
comprised disc extrusion in 40.6%. Likewise, there were disc protrusion in 37.9% and in fewer disc migration
with only 21.5%, continuing with lumbar disc degeneration and modic changes with 19.5% and 9.9%
respectively, having as a finding less frequent to spondylolysis with only 0.5%. The other findings were
congenital anomalies (5.3%) and neoplastic pathology (1%, represented by hemangiomas as the only type of
tumor) and, with less than 1% of cases, there were inflammatory pathologies (0.5%) and traumatic injuries
(0.2%). Among the congenital anomalies, the so-called transition anomalies stood out, such as lumbarizations
in 50% (conversion of the S1 vertebra) and sacralizations in 36.4% (conversion of the S5 vertebra).
Herniated discs located in the lumbosacral spine were 52.9%: disc extrusion accounted for 21.5%, disc
protrusion accounted for 20%, while only 11.4% were disc migration, given in 167 patients (
Table 1).
Table 1. Findings obtained by routine study by MRI of Lumbosacral spine
|
Type of Pathology in Lumbosacral Spine |
Specific diagnostic findings |
Degenerative |
Congenital |
Neoplastic |
Total |
n |
% |
n |
% |
n |
% |
n |
% |
Disc protrusion
|
83
|
21,6%
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
20,0%
|
Disc extrusión
|
89
|
23,1%
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
21,5%
|
Disc migration
|
47
|
12,2%
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
11,4%
|
Disc degeneration
|
75
|
19,5%
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
18,1%
|
Modic type II
|
21
|
5,5%
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
5,1%
|
Modic type I
|
17
|
4,4%
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
4,1%
|
Schmorl's nodes
|
7
|
1,8%
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
1,7%
|
Spondylolysis
|
2
|
0,5%
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
0,5%
|
Other degenerative types
|
44
|
11,4%
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
10,6%
|
Lumbarization
|
|
|
11
|
50,0%
|
|
|
11
|
2,7%
|
Sacralization
|
|
|
8
|
36,4%
|
|
|
8
|
1,9%
|
Other congenital types
|
|
|
3
|
13,6%
|
|
|
3
|
0,7%
|
Hemangioma
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
100%
|
4
|
1,0%
|
Other types Neoplastic
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
Other pathologies Vertebromedullary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
0,7%
|
Totals by types
|
385
|
100%
|
22
|
100%
|
4
|
100%
|
414
|
100%
|
Absolute total
|
385
|
93,0%
|
22
|
5,3%
|
4
|
1,0%
|
414
|
100%
|
Likewise, it is worth mentioning that the application of panoramic T2 sequence in the 181
previously mentioned cases allowed to denote additional findings at the cervical spine and dorsal spine,
which were 117 and 71, that is, 188 additional findings, thus constituting a total of 602 findings when
acquiring the MRI exam with the panoramic sequence included.
At the level of the cervical spine, there were basically degenerative pathologies in 99.1%,
highlighting herniated discs with 59.5%. Of this total, 58% comprised disc protrusion (especially in the
C5-C6 disc), disc extrusion in 39.1% and finally disc migration in 2.9% (Figure 1),
followed by 28, 4% due to disc degenerations. It should be mentioned that congenital anomalies were also
presented in 0.9%, represented by hydrosyringomyelia. It should be noted that localized hernias
accounted for 59% of cervical lesions, which in turn included disc protrusion in 34.2%, while 23.1%
consisted of disc extrusion and only 1.7% were disc migration (Table 2).
In the dorsal spine there was also a higher percentage of degenerative pathologies with a
frequency of 81.7%, where herniated disc predominated in more than half of the cases (51.7%), including
disc protrusion with 70% (especially in the D7-D8 disc) and disc extrusion with 30% (Figure 1); apart from Schmörl's nodules with 24.1% and disc degenerations with
20.7%. The remaining 18.3% in the dorsal segment corresponded to neoplastic pathologies, whose lineage
was specifically vertebral hemangioma. The dorsal hernias presented were 42.3% of the total findings,
comprising disc protrusion and disc extrusion in 29.6% and 12.7% respectively. Therefore, the main
findings located outside the lumbosacral spine were hernias, which occurred in 77 patients, both at the
cervical level, with 59%, and at the dorsal level with 42.3% (Table 2).
Table 2. Findings obtained outside the Lumbosacral spine by Panoramic T2 sequence
Panorámica
|
|
Type of Pathology outside the Lumbosacral spine
|
Specific diagnostic findings |
Degenerative |
Congenital |
Neoplastic |
Total |
n |
% |
n |
% |
n |
% |
n |
% |
Findings in the Cervical Spine |
Disc protrusion |
40 |
34,5% |
|
|
|
|
40 |
34,2% |
Disc extrusion |
27 |
23,3% |
|
|
|
|
27 |
23,1% |
Disc migration |
2 |
1,7% |
|
|
|
|
2 |
1,7% |
Disc degeneration |
33 |
28,4% |
|
|
|
|
33 |
28,2% |
Other degenerative types |
14 |
12% |
|
|
|
|
14 |
12% |
Hydrosyringomyelia |
|
|
1 |
100% |
|
|
1 |
0,9% |
Other congenital types |
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
|
0 |
0% |
Totals by type |
116 |
100% |
1 |
100% |
|
|
117 |
100% |
Absolute total at Cervical level |
116 |
99,1% |
1 |
0,9% |
|
|
117 |
100% |
Findings in the Dorsal Spine |
Disc protrusion |
21 |
36,2% |
|
|
|
|
21 |
29,6% |
Disc extrusion |
9 |
15,5% |
|
|
|
|
9 |
12,7% |
Schmorl's nodes |
14 |
24,1% |
|
|
|
|
14 |
19,7% |
Disc degeneration |
12 |
20,7% |
|
|
|
|
12 |
16,9% |
Other degenerative types |
2 |
3,4% |
|
|
|
|
2 |
2,8% |
Hemangiomas |
|
|
|
|
13 |
100% |
13 |
18,3% |
Other neoplastic types |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
Totals by type |
58 |
100% |
|
|
13 |
100% |
71 |
100% |
Absolute total at Dorsal level |
58 |
81,7% |
|
|
13 |
18,3% |
71 |
100% |
Regarding the location of herniated discs at the level of the lumbosacral spine, which has been the
most frequent lesion, it occurred mainly at the level of the L5-S1 disc in 42% of cases, although it also
occurred in the other intervertebral discs: L4- L5 with 39.7%, L3-L4 with 12.3%, L2-L3 with 3.2% and L1-L2
with 2.3%. The L5-S1 disc was the main location of disc extrusion and disc migration, with 44.9% and 55.1%
respectively, unlike protruding hernias located mainly in the L4-L5 disc, with 44.6% (
graphic
1).
|
Graphic 1. MRI of 2 cases with application of panoramic T2 Sequence: 1. 29-years-old pt.
(A), where disc extrusion in L5-S1 is denoted as well as disc protrusion in C5-C6 (images B and
C respectively). 2. 39-year-old pt. (D), where disc extrusion in L4-L5 is denoted as well as
disc protrusion in D7-D8 (images E and F respectively).
|
Graphic 2. Anatomical location of Herniated lumbar disc
The application of the panoramic T2 image for examination of the lumbosacral spine by magnetic resonance
imaging was verified using hypothesis testing for a proportion, taking into consideration that, as
H
0, the
technique does not allow 50% more findings to be located than in a regular examination, and that, as
H
1, the
technique does allow 50% more findings to be located in contrast to a regular test. In this way, the Sig
value of the corresponding Z
cal was obtained from the findings at the level of the lumbosacral
segment in
the conventional exam and the amount of findings obtained by adding the panoramic T2 sequence, obtaining Sig
= 0.031, which being less than 0.05, rejecting the null hypothesis and therefore at 95% confidence level, it
can be stated that the application of this. This sequence does allow 50% more findings to be located,
showing that it is useful for MR imaging of the lumbosacral spine.
DISCUSSION
The results demonstrate that the application of the panoramic T2-weighted sequence for the
lumbosacral spine examination is valid. Therefore, the importance of magnetic resonance imaging in the
evaluation of the spine is first reaffirmed, as stated by Aroche
(10) and Medina
(11). Second, that requests for examination with a specific presumption justify
their performance for a due evaluation, since they allow to see early changes and/or incipient lesions and
thus have a clinical relevance, as explained by Fretes
(12), Kovacs
(13), Millán and Cols
(14), and Rodríguez
(15).
Analyzing, the hypothesis verification defined that 50% more findings are located with the panoramic
sequence in question, unlike the usual study. This is similar as reported by Méndez
(16), which obtained 74.8% of additional findings using STIR sequence, applying
post-process after examination and considering elderly patients. In addition, what is proposed by
Schiappacasse
(17) and Campos
(18) is supported, where
it was proposed to use a sagittal sequence for the entire column. It also confirms what was concluded by
Burbano
(19) and Campos
(18), where the T2-weighted
image was superior for the various anomalies. In relation to this, what was expressed by Tito
(20), is corroborated, who indicated the importance of including this sequence in
the examination of an image that reveals adjacent lesions to those presented in the specific initial
evaluation segment.
Reviewing the findings, there was the presence of a greater number of degenerative pathologies, with
93% of findings. The main ones were herniated discs, with a frequency of 60%, which coincided with the
studies by Ortega
(21) at the Centro Médico Ecatepec, of the Instituto Mexicano
de Seguridad Social, with the studies by González
(22) at the Hospital
Universitario Nacional de Colombia, and with the findings of Enríquez
(23) in the
Clínica Pichincha, whose results were also the most outstanding, with 40.2%, 33.7% and 32.7% respectively.
The highest percentage were disc extrusion, in 40.6%, then protruding hernias, with 37.9%. These findings
were different and at the same time with a lower percentage compared to the studies by Ortega
(21) and González
(22), as well as the study of hernias
carried out by Solano and Ávila
(24) at the Hospital Carrasco de Cuenca, of the
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social, in which disc protrusions were mainly presented, with figures
equivalent to 73.3%, 87.6% and 96.7% in each case.
Similarly, it was found that the main location of the different types of hernias presented was
mainly at the level of the L5-S1 disc in 42% of cases. This result coincided with the theses of Gil
(25) in a Sanitary Production Company of Lima, with those of Rivero
(26) in the Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo of the Ministry of Health, with those of
Quispe
(27) in the Clínica La Luz de Lima, that of Medina
(28) in the Hospital Nacional “Ramiro Prialé Prialé”, of the Social Security -
EsSalud, and with those of Román
(29) in the Hospital Nacional “Luis N. Sáenz” of
the Peruvian National Police, in whose results it was also the main location, with 66%, 62%, 39.1%, 34.4%
and 34% respectively, fully endorsing that it is the most affected intervertebral disc in people regardless
of the activity that could develop and the population group to which they could belong.
Likewise, findings were obtained in both the cervical and dorsal spine, acquiring the panoramic T2
sequence. In both segments, the highest frequency was also given by herniated discs presented in 59.5% and
51.7% of cases, respectively. With this, it is confirmed that herniated discs are the most frequent
pathology of the entire spinal axis, and not only at the lumbosacral level. Clinically, the latter is the
area with the greatest symptomatological settlement due to the presence of some typical risk factors of the
activity, workload or rhythm of people's lives.
CONCLUSION
Through the present investigation, it was reaffirmed that the lumbosacral spine resonance is a
valuable exam because it allows the discard and/or evaluation of multiple findings with precision through
the possibility of differentiation. Degenerative entities are the most frequent, and it was shown that the
acquisition of the panoramic image in T2 is useful because it helps to locate a greater number of conditions
at the general level of the spine as in non-contiguous segments. Therefore, this sequence should be
considered as a fundamental element to find additional information that contributes to a better diagnosis,
compared to the usual lumbosacral magnetic resonance.
In this way, it was determined that the application of the panoramic T2 Sequence for lumbosacral
magnetic resonance is absolutely functional and useful in the diagnostic evaluation because it allows
locating 50% more additional findings compared to the usual study of the lumbosacral segment. The main
findings in the lumbosacral segment, as well as at the cervical and dorsal level, were degenerative
diseases, predominantly herniated discs in a greater proportion. The most frequent lumbosacral location was
the L5-S1 disc.
Authorship Contributions: ARM: Conception and design of the article, collection of
information, review of magnetic resonance imaging examinations, analysis and interpretation of
results, and writing of the manuscript; RRA: Planning and technical-administrative advice on the
article, statistical advice, critical review of the manuscript, and final approval of the
manuscript.
Funding sources: Self-financed
Declaration of Non-publication in another indexed journal: We declare that the material
contained in the manuscript has not been previously published or sent to another biomedical
journal.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Received: december 14, 2020
Approved: february 13, 2021
Correspondence: Alexander H. Román Meza.
Address: Cl. Tarata 493. La Perla - Callao.
Telephone number: 949071089 - 4200066
E-mail: alexrom2490@gmail.com
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
1. Ministerio de Salud. Análisis de la Situación de Salud del Perú, 2018. Lima:
Ministerio de Salud; 2019.
3. Fleckenstein P, Tranum J. Bases anatómicas del diagnóstico por imagen. 3a ed.
Barcelona: Elsevier; 2014.
4. Herring W. Radiología básica. Aspectos fundamentales. 4a ed. Madrid: Elsevier;
2020.
5. Burgos J, Izquierdo E, Sarramea H. Patología de la Columna Vertebral. Madrid:
Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2019.
6. Cura J del, Pedraza S, Gayete A, Rovira A. Radiología esencial. Tomo I. 2a ed.
Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2019.
7. Pastrana M, González C. Técnicas de imagen por resonancia magnética. Madrid:
Arán Ediciones S.L. 2015
8. Siemens. MAGNETOM Aera. Erlangen: Siemens; 2015.
9. Siemens. Imanes, espines y resonancias. Una introducción a los fundamentos de
la resonancia magnética. Erlangen: Siemens; 2015.
10. Aroche Y, Pons L, De La Cruz A, González I. Patogenia, cuadro clínico y
diagnóstico imagenológico por Resonancia magnética de las Hernias discales. MEDISAN. 2015;
19(3): 391-492.
11. Medina C. Correlación de los hallazgos tomográficos y en resonancia
magnética en pacientes con discopatías de columna lumbar, atendidos en el Centro de Alta
Tecnología del Hospital Escuela Antonio Lenin Fonseca, enero 2014 a enero 2015. Tesis de
Especialidad. Managua, Nicaragua. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
Nicaragua; 2016. 61 pp.
12. Fretes C. Papel de la RMN en diagnóstico, pronóstico y manejo de la
lumbalgia y radiculopatía. Rev Bol Dolor. 2015; 9(2): 33-39.
13. Kovacs F, Arana E. Patología degenerativa en la columna lumbar. Radiología.
2016; 58(1): 26-34.
14. Millán E, Cabrera A, Muñiz J, Sola C, Zubia J. Indicaciones de la resonancia
magnética en la lumbalgia de adultos. Rev Calid Asist. 2014; 29(1): 51-57.
15. Rodríguez C. Utilidad de la Resonancia magnética en pacientes con dolor
lumbar inespecífico. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. Madrid, España:
Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad – Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías
Sanitarias de la Comunidad de Madrid; 2013. 54 pp.
16. Méndez R. Beneficios de la inclusión de una secuencia panorámica de columna
vertebral en STIR en los protocolos del raquis en pacientes de 18 a 80 años en Clínica Tomonorte
2013-2014. Tesis. Lima, Perú. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos;
2014. 49 pp.
17. Schiappacasse G, Díaz J, Alvayay P. Protocolo abreviado de resonancia
magnética en espondiloartritis: más allá de la sacroileítis. Rev Med Chile. 2015; 143(1):
905-912.
18. Campos L y col. Valor de la resonancia magnética y del protocolo de cuerpo
completo en mieloma múltiple. Med Int Méx. 2014; 30(1): 745-754.
19. Burbano H, Belalcázar E, Fernández S. Resonancia magnética de la columna
lumbar: lo que el radiólogo debe conocer antes de elaborar un reporte. An Rad Méx. 2014; 13(1):
292-305.
20. Tito H. Importancia de la Secuencia T2 Panorámica en Columna Vertebral –
Instituto de Imágenes Médicas. Tesis de Especialidad. Lima, Perú. Facultad de Tecnología Médica,
Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal; 2019. 54 pp.
21. Ortega J. Hallazgos más frecuentes en Resonancia Magnética de cambios
osteodegenerativos en la Columna Lumbar en pacientes jóvenes con lumbago en el Centro Médico
ISSEMYM Ecatepec. Tesis de Especialidad. Ciudad de México, México: Facultad de Medicina,
Universidad Autónoma de México; 2014. 61 pp.
22. González E. Hallazgos degenerativos de Columna lumbar en Resonancia
magnética de pacientes con dolor lumbar. Tesis de Especialidad. Bogotá, Colombia: Facultad de
Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2013. 49 pp.
23. Enríquez D. Identificación de Patologías degenerativas del Disco
intervertebral de Columna lumbar en Pacientes mayores de 40 años por Resonancia magnética en la
Clínica Pichincha, Junio–Diciembre 2015. Tesis. Quito, Ecuador. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas,
Universidad Central del Ecuador; 2016. 171 pp.
24. Solano P, Ávila L. Prevalencia de Hernia de disco en Columna Lumbar
diagnosticada por Resonancia Magnética en el Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga IESS Cantón Cuenca.
Mayo 2014–Octubre 2014. Tesis. Cuenca, Ecuador: Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de
Cuenca; 2014. 43 pp.
25. Gil D. Alteraciones discales en Resonancias magnéticas de Columna lumbosacra
en Postulantes asintomáticos a una Empresa de Sanitarios. Tesis de Maestría. Lima, Perú.
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2017. 45 pp.
26. Rivero R. Prevalencia de Hernia discal en Columna Lumbar según Resonancia
magnética, Enero–Abril 2015. Tesis. Lima, Perú. Facultad de Tecnología Médica, Universidad
Nacional Federico Villarreal; 2019. 49 pp.
27. Quispe J. Hernia de Núcleo Pulposo a través de Resonancia magnética en
Columna lumbar Lima 2017. Tesis. Lima, Perú. Facultad de Tecnología Médica, Universidad Nacional
Federico Villarreal; 2018. 49 pp.
28. Medina M. Hallazgos radiológicos de la Hernia discal lumbar por Resonancia
magnética, en pacientes del Hospital Nacional “Ramiro Prialé Prialé”- EsSalud, Huancayo-2017.
Tesis. Huancayo, Perú. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Peruana Los Andes; 2019 80
pp.
29. Román R. Hernia de Núcleo Pulposo de Columna lumbosacra de Policías en
actividad según Resonancia. Tesis de Especialidad. Lima, Perú. Facultad de Tecnología Médica,
Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal; 2018. 43 pp.