CLINIC CASE
REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA HUMANA 2024 - Universidad Ricardo Palma
1Area of Human 20 Anatomy and Embryology, Medical and Social Sciences, Department of Surgery,
Universidad de Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares. Spain.
2PhD Program in Translational Medicine, Doctoral School, Universidad de Alcalá. Alcalá de 14
Henares. Spain.
ABSTRACT
The case presents a 46-year-old woman with left acute pyelonephritis and bilateral duplicated ureters.
Acute pyelonephritis is a severe urinary tract infection that can vary in clinical presentation, from
mild symptoms to sepsis. Lower back pain is a common symptom and can be unilateral or bilateral.
Duplicated ureters are a congenital anomaly resulting in the transport of urine from the same kidney to
the bladder, and can cause complications such as vesicoureteral reflux and ureteral obstruction.
Treatment involved antibiotics and outpatient urology follow-up. The case underscores the importance of
a meticulous diagnostic approach and consideration of underlying congenital anomalies that can
complicate clinical management and treatment. The integration of clinical findings and complementary
tests was essential for an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment plan.
Keywords: pyelonephritis; vesico-ureteral reflux; ureteral obstruction; low back pain. (source:
MeSH
NLM)
RESUMEN
El caso es de una mujer de 46 años con pielonefritis aguda izquierda y duplicidad ureteral bilateral. La
pielonefritis aguda es una infección grave del tracto urinario que puede variar en su presentación
clínica, desde síntomas leves hasta sepsis. El dolor lumbar es un síntoma común en la pielonefritis
aguda, y puede presentarse de forma unilateral o bilateral. La duplicidad ureteral es una anomalía
congénita que resulta en uréteres que transportan la orina desde el mismo riñón hasta la vejiga, y puede
causar complicaciones como reflujo vesicoureteral y obstrucción ureteral. El tratamiento incluyó
antibióticos y control ambulatorio en consulta de Urología. El caso destaca la importancia de un enfoque
diagnóstico meticuloso y la consideración de anomalías congénitas subyacentes que pueden complicar el
cuadro clínico y el tratamiento. La integración de hallazgos clínicos, análisis de laboratorio y pruebas
de imagen fue fundamental para el diagnóstico preciso y el plan de tratamiento adecuado.
Palabras clave: Pielonefritis, reflujo vesicoureteral, obstrucción ureteral, dolor de la región
lumbar. (fuente: DeCS-BIREME)
INTRODUCTION
Acute pyelonephritis is a severe infection of the urinary tract that affects the renal pelvis and
parenchyma. The clinical presentation can vary from mild symptoms, such as dysuria, to sepsis due to
Gram-negative bacilli. Approximately 20% of patients do not exhibit urinary symptoms, and some may not
have a fever. The diagnosis of pyelonephritis is confirmed by urine culture, and in approximately 80% of
patients with pyelonephritis, the colony count is greater than 100,000 CFU/mL (1).
Low back pain is a common symptom in acute pyelonephritis and can be unilateral or bilateral (2). In patients with bilateral low back pain, acute pyelonephritis presents
unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.
Ureteral duplication is a congenital anomaly where two ureters carry urine from the same kidney to the
bladder. This condition can be complete, with two entirely separate ureters, or incomplete, with two
ureters that join before reaching the bladder (3). Complications of ureteral
duplication can include vesicoureteral reflux, ureteral obstruction, or ectopic ureteral insertion
(4).
In patients with acute pyelonephritis, bilateral low back pain, and ureteral duplication, clinical
management can be particularly challenging. Bilateral low back pain can be a symptom of both acute
pyelonephritis and ureteral duplication, complicating the diagnosis. Additionally, ureteral duplication
can increase the risk of complications from acute pyelonephritis, such as vesicoureteral reflux and
ureteral obstruction (5).
Treatment of acute pyelonephritis generally involves antibiotics. Clinical follow-up with urine culture
seven to fourteen days after the end of antibiotic treatment may be necessary. In cases of recurrent
pyelonephritis, suppressive antibiotic treatment may be considered (1).
This case involves a 46-year-old female patient who presented to the emergency room with a temperature
of 38.7°C, bilateral lumbar pain, malodorous urine, mild abdominal pain, dysuria, and nausea. Physical
examination revealed bilateral ureteral duplication. Laboratory tests showed a left shift, and
urinalysis indicated the presence of leukocytes, bacteriuria, and moderate pyuria, suggesting a urinary
tract infection (UTI). Imaging confirmed the diagnosis of acute left-sided pyelonephritis and ureteral
duplication. The patient was treated with antibiotics and scheduled for follow-up at the Urology clinic.
Pyelonephritis is a urinary infection defined by the presence of pathogens in the urine, typically
bacteria, and occasionally fungi or viruses. When the kidney is affected, it is termed acute
pyelonephritis, characterized by fever (6), chills, lumbar pain, and
malaise, accompanied by significant bacteriuria (7). In some cases,
pyelonephritis can progress slowly, causing significant renal damage leading to serious renal function
disorders or high blood pressure (8). Once these lesions appear, they are
irreversible, underscoring the importance of early diagnosis of chronic pyelonephritis.
Ureteral duplication is the most common congenital urinary tract anomaly, with an incidence of one in
every 125 live births (5). It is more frequent in females (2:1 ratio), and
the unilateral form is six times more common than the bilateral form. Duplicated ureters can be
associated with vesicoureteral reflux and other physiopathological considerations. Comprehensive
management of this patient required the integration of clinical findings, laboratory analysis, and
imaging tests to achieve an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment plan (4). The objective of this report is to describe the clinical presentation,
diagnosis, and management of a patient with acute pyelonephritis complicated by bilateral low back pain
and ureteral duplication.
CASE REPORT
The case presents a 46-year-old female patient who came to the emergency room with a temperature of
38.7°C (311.85 K), bilateral lower back pain that had started the day before, foul-smelling urine for
the past two days, mild morning abdominal pain, dysuria, and nausea. She denied having a fever and the
possibility of pregnancy. The patient has no history of high blood pressure, diabetes, or
hypercholesterolemia. However, she has a history of bilateral ureteral duplication with left reflux and
has had two episodes of perianal fistula. She has also had asymptomatic UTIs, with the last positive
urine culture in December 2015 for Escherichia coli and Enterococcus, both sensitive to Ciprofloxacin.
On physical examination, the patient appeared well, was alert and oriented, well-hydrated, and had a
regular pulse. She was eupneic at rest. Her abdomen was soft and depressible, painless without signs of
peritoneal irritation, masses, or enlargement, and with a positive bilateral kidney punch (greater on
the left). Her extremities showed no edema or signs of deep vein thrombosis. She had tenderness on
palpation of the paravertebral lumbar muscles.
Several tests were performed, including a complete blood count, coagulation tests, serum biochemistry,
and a basic urinalysis. An abdominal X-ray, an urgent kidney ultrasound, and an intravenous urography
were also performed. The white blood cell count in the blood test was slightly elevated (11.02/µL) and
it also revealed a left shift, which may indicate an immune response to an infection. Hemoglobin,
hematocrit, and platelet levels were within normal ranges. Coagulation times [Activated Partial
Thromboplastin Clotting Time (APTT), prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio (INR)] and
prothrombin activity were also within normal limits. In serum biochemistry, all values were within
normal ranges, indicating normal kidney function and electrolyte balance. In the urine analysis, the
presence of 500 white blood cells/µL and 200 mg/dL of proteinuria suggested a UTI. The presence of
moderate bacteriuria and moderate pyuria also supported this diagnosis.
The abdominal X-ray did not show any calcium density images, which could indicate the presence of kidney
stones. However, phleboliths were observed in the upper pelvis, which are small calcium masses that form
in the veins. The kidney ultrasound showed a normal-sized right kidney and a larger-than-normal left
kidney with a double pyelocaliceal system, a congenital anomaly in which the kidney has two urine
collection systems instead of one. There were no signs of kidney stones or perirenal changes. An
anechoic image was observed in the distal left ureter, which could indicate ureteral dilation. The
bladder was full and contained some echoes, which could be related to debris. The intravenous urography
showed asymmetry in kidney size, with the left kidney larger than the right. Both kidneys showed good
contrast uptake and elimination. The left kidney showed dilation of the calyceal and infundibular
systems and a duplicated pyeloureteral system, an anomaly in which there are two ureters or parts of the
ureter instead of one. The cause of the calyceal infundibulum dilation was not visualized. On the left
side, there was dilation of the calyceal systems with probable kidney malrotation. The left ureter was
single and slightly dilated distally. The bladder was distended and showed no alterations.
The primary diagnosis was acute left pyelonephritis with a secondary diagnosis of probable left
vesicoureteral reflux. The standard diagnostic test for pyelonephritis is urine culture, which was
positive for Escherichia coli. The antibiogram showed sensitivity to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, so
treatment was initiated for the patient's episode. Treatment included amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1
g/200 mg orally every eight hours for 14 days, paracetamol 1 g orally every eight hours if needed,
ibuprofen 600 mg orally every eight hours for four or five days if needed, alternating with paracetamol,
and omeprazole orally once a day for 14 days. An appointment was scheduled for a Urology outpatient
visit. A high fluid intake was recommended, and it was indicated that if the fever exceeded 38°C (311.15
K) after 48 hours of antibiotic treatment (9), the patient should return to
the emergency room
DISCUSSION
Acute pyelonephritis is a pathological condition that can present with a wide clinical spectrum, from
mild symptoms to severe conditions such as sepsis (4, 10).
Despite urine culture being the gold standard for diagnosis, the variability in clinical presentation
can hinder early identification of the disease, especially in the absence of urinary symptoms or fever,
which occurs in approximately 20% of cases. Ureteral duplication, a common congenital anomaly, can
predispose individuals to complications such as vesicoureteral reflux and ureteral obstruction, further
complicating the picture of pyelonephritis. Although ureteral duplication is not commonly reported as a
condition that increases the risk of complicated infection, in this case, the patient presented with
recurrent UTIs, suggesting a potential relationship between the congenital anomaly and an increased risk
of infectious complications. The incidence of this anomaly is one in 125 live births, being more common
in women and presenting unilaterally more frequently than bilaterally.
In this case, the patient presented with bilateral lower back pain, a symptom that can be attributed to
both pyelonephritis and ureteral duplication, emphasizing the importance of a meticulous diagnostic
approach that includes laboratory analysis and imaging. The complete blood count revealed leukocytosis
with a left shift, suggesting an active immune response to a bacterial infection, consistent with the
diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis. The management of acute pyelonephritis generally includes
antibiotics, and in this case, clinical follow-up with urine culture and outpatient monitoring in
urology was chosen.
The limitations in managing this case include the difficulty in establishing a differential diagnosis
due to the overlap of symptoms between pyelonephritis and complications of ureteral duplication. An
imaging study with contrasted urotem is recommended to confirm the presence of acute pyelonephritis,
especially in patients with anatomical anomalies such as ureteral duplication. Additionally, the
presence of a congenital anomaly like ureteral duplication may require a more complex therapeutic
approach and prolonged follow-up.
The conclusions of this case are justified by the correlation between clinical, laboratory, and imaging
findings, which confirmed the diagnosis of left acute pyelonephritis in the context of bilateral
ureteral duplication. It is important to discuss the necessity of performing ultrasounds and other
imaging studies in cases of UTIs to identify anatomical anomalies and guide treatment. Additionally,
consideration should be given to whether the antibiotic treatment administered was the most appropriate
according to clinical practice guidelines. The favorable response to antibiotic treatment and the
follow-up recommendations reinforce the appropriateness of clinical management.
The main lessons from this case report include the need for a high index of suspicion for pyelonephritis
in patients with lower back pain, even in the absence of classic urinary symptoms, and the importance of
considering underlying congenital anomalies that can complicate the clinical picture and treatment. This
case also highlights the relevance of an interdisciplinary approach to managing complex urological
conditions.
CONCLUSION
This case underscores the importance of considering underlying congenital anomalies such as ureteral
duplication in patients with acute pyelonephritis, even in the absence of classic urinary symptoms.
Accurate diagnosis and effective treatment require a thorough integration of clinical, laboratory, and
imaging findings.
Authorship contributions:
MFS participated in the conceptualization, research, methodology, and writing and reviewing
of the original draft.
Financing:
Self-funded
Declaration of conflict of interest:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Recevied:
December 18, 2023
Approved:
April 11, 2024
Correspondence author:
Manuel Flores Sáenz.
Address:
Campus Científico-Tecnológico: Crta. Madrid-Barcelona, Km. 33,600. 28871 Alcalá de
Henares. España.
Phone:
(+34) 918855839
E-mail:
manuel.floress@uah.es
Article published by the Journal of the faculty of Human Medicine of the Ricardo Palma University. It is an open access article, distributed under the terms of the Creatvie Commons license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), that allows non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is duly cited. For commercial use, please contact revista.medicina@urp.edu.pe.