REVIEW ARTICLE
REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA HUMANA 2024 - Universidad Ricardo Palma
1 Department of Medical Specialties, Universidad de La Frontera. Temuco, Chile
2 Universita Degli Studi di Verona, Italia.
3 Department of Pathological Anatomy, Universidad de La Frontera. Temuco, Chile.
a Surgeon
b Pathological Anatomist
c Master in Science Medico Forensi
ABSTRACT
Despite the numerous efforts of the international community to eradicate all forms of violence against
women, this problem is far from being resolved. According to the UN, one in three women has suffered
physical or sexual violence from an intimate partner, sexual violence outside the couple, or both at
least once in their life. Addressing this problem as a social health need of population groups allows an
approach to gender violence as a collective health problem.
At the level of physical violence, strangulation/suffocation has been identified as one of the most
lethal forms of domestic violence and sexual assault. Victims of domestic violence who have been choked
or strangled are 7.5 times more likely to be killed by their partner. A victim of
strangulation/suffocation can lose consciousness in seconds or die within minutes, days or weeks after
the attack, as well as suffer permanent brain damage or disability or emotional trauma.
Recently, legal changes have been generated in the configuration of this crime, the penalties have
increased in United Kingdom, the United States, Australia and New Zealand.
The current non-systematic narrative review of literature sought to explore updated medico-legal aspects
of non-fatal strangulation/suffocation in the context of gender violence, and are highlightedrelevant
implications for clinical practice.
Keywords: Asphyxia, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, forensic medicine, physical
examination (Source: MeSH).
RESUMEN
A pesar de los numerosos esfuerzos de la comunidad internacional en pos de erradicar todas las formas de
violencia contra las mujeres, esta problemática se encuentra lejos de ser resuelta. Según la ONU, una de
cada tres mujeres ha sufrido violencia física o sexual por parte de la pareja, violencia sexual fuera de
la pareja, o de ambas, al menos una vez en su vida. El abordaje de esta problemática, en tanto necesidad
social de salud de grupos poblacionales, permite una aproximación a la violencia de género como un
problema de salud colectiva.
En el plano de la violencia física, la estrangulación/sofocación ha sido identificada como una de las
formas más letales de violencia doméstica y agresión sexual; se ha reportado que una víctima que es
estrangulada una primera vez tiene 7,5 más probabilidades de ser asesinada posteriormente por el mismo
abusador. Una víctima de estrangulación/sofocación puede perder la conciencia en segundos o morir en
minutos, días o semanas después del ataque o sufrir daño cerebral permanente o invalidez, además del
trauma emocional.
Recientemente, se han generado cambios legales en la configuración de este delito; las penas han
aumentado en el Reino Unido, Estados Unidos, Australia y Nueva Zelandia.
El propósito de esta revisión de literatura de tipo narrativo, no sistemática, está orientada a
presentar aspectos médico-legales actualizados de la estrangulación/sofocación no fatal en el contexto
de la violencia de género, y se resaltan aquellas implicancias relevantes para la práctica clínica.
Palabras clave: Asfixia, violencia doméstica, violencia de pareja, medicina forense, examen
físico (Fuente: DeCS-BIREME)
INTRODUCTION
Gender equity, understood as the balanced recognition and valuation of the potential of women and men,
the distribution of power between both, and its application, establishes the recognition of different
realities, interests, and needs of women and men for the formulation of plans, programs, and
interventions that aim at a differentiated and efficient impact, recognizing and working on social
inequities. Despite numerous efforts by the international community to eradicate all forms of violence
against women, this problem is far from being solved. According to the UN, it is estimated that one in
three women has suffered physical or sexual violence by a partner, sexual violence outside the
partnership, or both, at least once in their life (1).
Violence against women, in the family context, can have physical, psychological, economic, and sexual
aspects (2). In the area of physical violence, strangulation has been
identified as one of the most
lethal forms of domestic violence and sexual aggression and has become one of the most accurate
predictors of subsequent homicide in victims of intrafamily violence (3, 4).
Legal medical textbooks, usually, focus on the phenomenon of asphyxiation as a finding in necropsy,
however, gender violence contexts hide many non-fatal cases that do not appear in official figures and
that may eventually turn up at health centers, where staff should be able to detect and, eventually,
formalize the corresponding complaint. Moreover, a particular group of victims may present even serious
complications including the possibility of a deferred death (5, 6).
Internationally, the so-called non-fatal strangulation/suffocation (without resulting in death) is
configured as any case in which a person intentionally strangles or suffocates another, including cases
of intrafamily violence (7 - 9). The legal approach to
these types of aggressions led to changes in laws
and associated penalties in the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, and New Zealand; defining it
as a crime and increasing the severity of sanctions, including prison sentences (7).
The purpose of this narrative, non-systematic literature review is to present updated medico-legal
aspects of non-fatal strangulation/suffocation in the context of gender violence; highlighting those
implications relevant for clinical practice.
Medico-Legal Aspects
The Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women was approved without a vote by the United
Nations General Assembly with Resolution 48/104 on December 20, 1993, in which it was established as a
violation of their rights and a factor of severity that affects health (1).
WHO estimates from 2018
reported that the lifetime prevalence of violence in women worldwide is 30% (1).
Among the forms of physical violence against women, strangulation and suffocation present a high risk of
lethality, and are associated with other forms of aggression (10). It is
described as a type of abuse
associated with the pursuit of control and intimidation of the victim, over homicidal intent (3, 6, 11, 12), but,
despite its intimidating nature, exposes victims 7.5 times more than the rest of the
population to be murdered (3).
Considering the varied meanings of the term suffocation, for the purposes of this review, we have
considered it as mechanical asphyxiation by occlusion of the respiratory orifices (13 - 15), which in the
case of the law in the United Kingdom extends to "any action that affects the ability to breathe and is
considered assault" towards the victim (16). In contrast, strangulation
corresponds to mechanical
asphyxiation produced by compression of the neck by an active force exerted by hands, ligature, body
parts, or another rigid object, which makes it difficult to adequately oxygenate the brain, mainly due
to vascular occlusion (3, 13).
Plattner et al., in a retrospective case study, specifies the distribution of strangulation victims
according to their type and demographic aspects. Regarding the type of strangulation, 82% of cases
corresponded to manual strangulation, 16% by ligature, and 2% a combination of the previous ones. 97% of
the victims were adults, predominantly between the ages of 20 and 30, and 3%, children. 85% of the
victims are female, and 15%, male. All the male victims in this series were attacked by men. Of the
women, only in two cases was a female aggressor suspected (9).
The intensity of the sequelae or the death of the victim would be directly proportional to the time of
exposure to oxygen deprivation and to the active force exerted, although these premises are based on
case studies in fatal hangings captured by video (3, 17).
One of these reviews is carried out by the
Working Group on Human Asphyxia, in which it was observed that people lost consciousness within the
first 10 seconds of vascular occlusion, the appearance of petechiae occurred within 30 seconds of venous
occlusion, and they maintained movements and respiratory noises for around two minutes (3), results
similar to the study by Kabat in 1943 (18). Even in people who have been
released alive from the
occluding element (in strangulation or in hanging), there may be a deferred death due to anoxic
encephalopathy secondary to reduced cerebral blood flow (5, 17).
While research on gender violence in the last 30 years has favored advances in the typification of
crimes against women, only a few countries have specific laws regarding non-fatal
strangulation/suffocation. One of the initial major obstacles was to demonstrate its occurrence and to
socialize the extreme form of violence it represents. Multiple initiatives with victim participation,
such as "we can't consent to this" (a UK group whose volunteers seek to raise awareness of sexual
violence) and the "Centre for Women's Justice" (a UK organization made up of lawyers and academics
specializing in violence against women), have promoted studies, systematic reviews, and even legal
advice. Their work has made it possible to visualize the neurophysiological impact of aggression on
survivors of non-fatal strangulation episodes (19).
Currently, this form of aggression is criminalized in countries such as the United States (20),
Australia, and the United Kingdom (16). In the United Kingdom, the new
Domestic Violence, Crime and
Victims Act was enacted on June 7, 2022, which in its sections 75 A and 75 B typifies the crime of
non-fatal strangulation/suffocation (7, 16, 21), which is not limited to the results of the acts, but to
the action itself of cervical compression or occlusion of respiratory orifices. With this, it is not
required that the victim loses consciousness or has accentuated secondary damages for the crime to be
configured (7, 16). Along with its new typification,
sanctions were increased and differentiated from
what was previously established in the context of bodily injuries. The new penalties range from one to
five years of effective imprisonment, and compare with the previous payment of fines (16, 21). The
population affected by this law is not only citizens within the territorial limits, but also people who
carry the nationality and commit the criminal act abroad, as well as foreign residents and foreigners in
transit within the territorial limits (7, 16, 21). After its enactment, in 2022, the first detainee was
on June 10, 2022 (8) and one of the first sentenced to prison was on October
27, 2022, with a sentence
of 18 months. For the application of this legislative change, the Crown Prosecution Service developed
guidelines for its lawyers to make proper use of these legal changes and how to direct the investigation
(7, 22), similar to the guide issued by the California
District Attorneys Association (CDAA). In the
case of training and technical assistance for professionals involved in contexts of intrafamily
violence, there are institutions such as the Training Institute on Strangulation Prevention (20) and The
Family Justice Center Alliance, both from California, which, in addition to providing legal assistance
to victims, are also research and training centers for professionals in both the legal and health
fields. One achievement of these initiatives was that, step by step, the different states of the North
American country ended up typifying non-fatal strangulation/suffocation as a serious crime in itself and
not as a minor offense or misdemeanor (9, 23); Ohio was
the last to include it in April 2023.
In Chilean medico-legal practice, non-fatal strangulation/suffocation is not specifically typified, but
is included within the crimes of bodily injury. Under this concept, there may be an increase in its
legal qualification, if it is carried out in the context of intrafamily violence (24). Injuries are
classified according to their severity, so the crime of injuries considers sentences that will depend on
the result of the attack from one person to another, from a misdemeanor in the case of minor injuries to
crimes with penalties of 10 years in case of mutilation or permanent damage. However, when injuries
occur in the context of gender violence or intrafamily violence, it would constitute an aggravating
factor, which implies risking a minimum penalty of 61 days of imprisonment, regardless of the magnitude
of the injuries. The penalty could reach up to 15 years of imprisonment for the aggravating factor of
injuries in the context of intrafamily violence. The scope of the norm is limited to crimes committed in
the territory of the Republic by inhabitants and foreigners (24).
Implications for Clinical Practice
Healthcare professionals may encounter patients who have suffered non-fatal strangulation/suffocation in
various scenarios of their practice, including emergency services, whether because the victim
spontaneously relates it, as a reason for consultation, or through the detection of suggestive physical
signs. This medico-legal entity requires active suspicion to identify patients in danger, especially
because cases without obvious external injuries can be treated (6).
History and Physical Examination
Only 5% of strangulation victims seek medical attention within the first 48 hours after the assault; it
is interpreted that they would seek help due to the appearance of some symptom (4). When medical
assistance is sought, symptoms such as neck pain (25), hoarseness (11, 26), dysphagia (3, 11, 19),
headache (11), breathing difficulties (3, 11, 25, 26), dizziness (3, 19), tinnitus (19), and
vision
changes (19, 26) are reported. It has also been described
that patients can consult showing great
emotional distress and anguish, which can cause medical teams to underestimate the reported aggression,
biasing the consultation and attributing symptoms to a state of intoxication, hyperexcitation, and even
substance abuse (5, 6, 27).
In traditional forensic pathology texts, it is common to find a section devoted to the so-called
asphyxia syndrome and its possible causes, which are multiple, and whose classically described signs are
petechiae, visceral congestion, pulmonary edema, cyanosis, and the controversial fluidity of the blood
(13 - 15). Likewise, these texts usually address
strangulation and suffocation separately and mention the
inconsistent presence of contusive lesions (ecchymosis, erosions, and excoriations) in a ligature or
finger pattern on the neck and facial region. It should be noted that these classic signs are
nonspecific by themselves for the diagnosis of the cause of asphyxia, so a correlation must be
established with the study of the scene and the remaining background of the investigation (3, 13, 17),
in pursuit of making plausible diagnoses.
More specifically, and with special attention to non-fatal strangulation/suffocation, there are articles
highlighting that 50% of the victims did not present visible cervical injuries at the time of
examination (5, 6, 27). In another
series, it is reported that although 75% of the evaluated people were
examined during the first 24 hours post-assault (11), 35% of them presented
injuries categorized as
mild. Comparing the injuries described in reports of both surviving and deceased patients, it is
described that in strangulation/suffocation, it is possible to recognize contusive injuries of similar
characteristics and distribution, which may be added to cutaneous, conjunctival, and/or oropharyngeal
mucosa petechiae (3, 5, 6, 11,
25, 26). Facial and/or cervical edema has also been
described (6, 25, 26). However, the
physical examination may not present visible injuries because it clinically occurred
with signs that disappear quickly, such as erythema or discrete edema (28).
Other findings described in
the physical examination are contusions (ecchymosis, erosions, and wounds of the skin and lip mucosa,
epistaxis, fracture of the hyoid and laryngeal structures, hoarse voice, nausea and vomiting, memory
loss, consciousness compromise, seizures, incontinence of sphincters, facial paralysis or of
extremities, swallowing disorder, tremor, hemianopsia, ptosis, ataxia, coma, or dissection of the
carotid arteries (5, 6, 11, 19, 25, 26, 28).
Complications that occur within the first 48 hours after the assault include aspiration pneumonia,
laryngeal edema, pulmonary edema, ischemic stroke, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, and death (5, 6, 17, 25, 28).
Plattner et al. propose the categorization of non-fatal strangulation and consider the severity and
systematization of physical examination findings, on the condition that the complete medico-legal
examination of the victim is carried out up to two days after the incident (figures 1 and 2) (25).
Additional Studies
Regarding additional studies, the reviewed publications suggest their implementation in symptomatic
patients for the detection of injuries requiring specialty treatment:
Cervical radiography for the detection of fractures (5, 17, 29).
Nasofibro-laryngoscopy to visualize petechiae of the laryngeal mucosa (5, 17, 29).
Computed tomography of the brain (5) and/or neck (3).
Magnetic resonance imaging of the neck (5, 26) and/or
brain (26).
Carotid or vertebral artery angiography by computed tomography (CT Angio): described as the standard of
reference for the evaluation of blood vessels (26, 29).
Carotid or vertebral artery angiography by magnetic resonance imaging (MRA) (29).
Management
Regarding approach and follow-up, it is recommended as good practice to keep patients under observation
for a period of time, not always specified, mainly due to the possibility of developing delayed
complications such as cervical or laryngeal edema, due to their life-threatening risk (5, 17, 26, 28, 30).
Considering the heterogeneous symptoms and signs, the possibility of immediate complications, and their
potential rapid evolution, different reviews suggest that a detailed evaluation and documentation of
external and internal injuries be carried out in cases of strangulation/suffocation, for a better
understanding by the justice prosecuting bodies regarding the real magnitude of the aggression (3, 11).
In this regard, the Faculty of Legal and Forensic Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians has issued
at least two publications on the subject; also, it is mentioned to consider the evaluation of the
patient by a specialist doctor in the presence of loss of consciousness, incontinence of sphincters,
respiratory difficulty with decreased oxygen saturation, difficulty or inability to speak, presence of
extensive ecchymosis, or subcutaneous cervical emphysema (6, 28). Additionally, it is recommended that,
in suspected cases, along with the pertinent medical care, a clinical record that includes key or
relevant points is made, which consider:
Complete record on the care sheet with description of positive and negative findings (27).
Photographs of the neck (anterior, posterior, and lateral) of the initial external injuries, and their
evolution if necessary, especially due to the risk of not being able to be verified in the following
days (6).
Performed imaging studies.
Consider the collection of evidence, such as subungual content (6).
It should be noted that health records, such as the medical record and/or emergency care forms, are
legally relevant documents when it comes to investigating crimes that threaten the physical integrity
and health of people and, sometimes, constitute the only evidence for judicial investigation (3).
CONCLUSIONS
In the field of violence against women, which includes intrafamily and sexual violence, non-fatal
strangulation/suffocation is a medico-legal entity that has gradually been recognized as a crime in the
international context, given its prevalence and importance as a predictor of homicide. Efforts by
academic, medical, judicial, and citizen bodies have enabled its visibility and socialization.
Healthcare personnel must maintain an expectant attitude in the context of gender violence, both
oriented towards suspicion and the search for injuries that, at first glance, might go unnoticed, since,
depending on the distribution and severity of the injuries associated with an episode of
strangulation/suffocation, scenarios can range from the absence of visible injuries to death. In the
spectrum of clinical presentations, a victim of strangulation/suffocation can lose consciousness in
seconds or die in minutes, days, or weeks after the assault. This is due to associated injuries,
complications of the respiratory system, or brain damage; to which is added the emotional impact on the
victim.
Consequently, good practice involves active suspicion, possible hospitalization, adequate clinical
records, and the performance of pertinent additional studies, as well as the presentation of a complaint
to the relevant judicial authorities, always incorporating informed consent and confidentiality
safeguards.
Authorship contributions:
MNG participated in the conceptualization, research, methodology, resources, and writing of
the original draft. SHU participated in the conceptualization, methodology, writing and
review of the draft.
Financing:
Self-financed
Declaration of conflict of interest:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Recevied:
January 22, 2024
Approved:
February 8, 2024
Correspondence author:
Mónica Núñez Garrido
Address:
Manuel Bulnes 369, Temuco, Araucania Region, Chile.
Phone:
(+56) 991616671
E-mail:
monica.nunez.g@gmail.com
Article published by the Journal of the faculty of Human Medicine of the Ricardo Palma University. It is an open access article, distributed under the terms of the Creatvie Commons license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/), that allows non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is duly cited. For commercial use, please contact revista.medicina@urp.edu.pe.