Download PDF See article
STATE in DRAFT

Artículo Caso Clínico

10.25176/RFMH.v24i4.6519

Dengue infection in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: A Case Report

Dengue infection in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: A Case Report

Infección por dengue en un paciente con lupus eritematoso sistémico: Reporte de Caso

1 High Specialty Medical Unit, Specialty Hospital, National Medical Center "Gral. de Div. Manuel Ávila Camacho", Mexican Institute of Social Security, Puebla de Zaragoza, Puebla, Mexico.

a General Physician specializing in Internal Medicine

b Rheumatology Specialist

c Pediatrics Specialist

d General Physician

e Neurology Specialist

f General Surgery Specialist

Abstract

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease caused by an autoreactive B and T cell response with loss of immune tolerance to self-antigens. It manifests with asthenia, fever, myalgias, arthralgias, skin rash and fatal organ damage. Dengue is a zoonotic disease caused by the dengue virus (DENV), transmitted by mosquitoes of the Aedes aegypti species. Diagnostic suspicion is made in the presence of acute febrile syndrome with clinical manifestations and demographic history. Confirmation is by detection of the virus by PCR-RT, or of the structural protein NS1. The present case report is a 58-year-old woman with data of lupus exacerbation and with clinical manifestations suggestive of Dengue fever, with a history of travel to an endemic area. The confirmatory PCR-RT test leads to appropriate medical treatment. The importance of the case lies in differentiating the diagnosis in a timely manner.

Keywords:

Systemic lupus erythematosus, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, dengue, viral zoonoses, fever.

Resumen

El lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) es una enfermedad autoinmune por respuesta autorreactiva de células B y T con pérdida de la tolerancia inmunitaria frente a autoantígenos. Se manifiesta con astenia, fiebre, mialgias, artralgias, erupción dérmica y daño fatal a órgano. El dengue es una enfermedad zoonótica por el virus de dengue (DENV), transmitida por mosquitos de la especie Aedes aegypti. La sospecha diagnóstica se realiza en presencia de síndrome febril agudo con manifestaciones clínicas y antecedentes demográficos. La confirmación es por la detección del virus mediante PCR-RT o de la proteína estructural NS1. El presente caso clínico se trata de una mujer de 58 años con datos de exacerbación lúpica y con manifestaciones clínicas sugerentes de dengue; al interrogatorio evidenció el antecedente de viaje a zona endémica. La prueba confirmatoria de PCR-RT conduce a adecuación del tratamiento médico. La importancia del caso recae en diferenciar el diagnóstico oportunamente.

Palabras clave:

Lupus eritematoso sistémico, lupus eritematoso cutáneo, dengue, zoonosis virales, fiebre

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, inflammatory, autoimmune disease characterized by an autoreactive response of B and T cells, leading to a loss of immune tolerance to self-antigens. Its clinical manifestations can be mild, moderate, or, in more severe cases, life-threatening. It is characterized by symptoms such as asthenia, fever, myalgia, arthralgia, skin rash, and potentially fatal organ damage both at the onset and during disease activity 1
1. Kiriakidou M, Ching CL. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11):ITC81-ITC96. doi: 10.7326/AITC202006020. PMID: 32479157.
.

Dengue is a zoonosis transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and causes fever, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, and transient skin rashes. In severe cases, it can lead to respiratory difficulties, hemorrhage, and multiple organ failure 2
2.Referencia N2
.

The objective of this case report is to describe the clinical presentation of dengue in a patient with SLE.

Case Report

A 58-year-old woman, originally from the state of Chiapas, and a resident of the state of Puebla for the last 10 years, was diagnosed with lupus involving mucocutaneous and joint manifestations since 2019. At the time of this report, the patient was undergoing treatment with chloroquine 150 mg, azathioprine 90 mg, and prednisone 7.5 mg every 24 hours. She had also been diagnosed with systemic arterial hypertension since 2019, for which she was being treated with valsartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide (5 mg/160 mg/12.5 mg) every 24 hours.

On January 9, 2023, she presented with a fever of 38.9°C, holocranial headache, hyporexia, asthenia, and arthralgia. She self-medicated with 500 mg of acetaminophen, resulting in partial improvement. Two days later, her fever returned (38.9°C), accompanied by nausea and one episode of gastrointestinal vomiting. She was hospitalized for febrile syndrome under study, and her maintenance treatment for SLE was suspended.

Upon admission, she had a fever of 38.9°C and knee pain. Physical examination revealed erythematous papules on the eyelids and malar region, with no ulcers in the nasal or oral mucosa. A maculopapular rash with erythematous papules and mild confluent scaling was noted on the anterior chest and the right posterior hemithorax. No cardiopulmonary or abdominal involvement was observed. The upper limbs showed a maculopapular rash, and the lower limbs exhibited limited flexion and extension due to knee pain. The results of blood count, blood chemistry, and coagulation tests are shown in Table 1. The general urinalysis reported: cloudy brown appearance, 100 leukocytes/µL, negative nitrites, 150 mg/dL proteins, 250 erythrocytes/µL, 30-41 leukocytes per field, 40-50 erythrocytes per field, 2+ bacteria, 1+ epithelial cells, 0-1 hyaline casts, and 0-1 granular casts. A rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 was negative.

The patient received treatment with acetaminophen 1 g every 8 hours and Hartmann solution 1000 ml IV every 24 hours. She had a slow evolution with persistent fever and increased arthralgia and edema in her lower limbs. Upon further questioning, the patient reported a recent trip to an endemic area (state of Chiapas) one week before the onset of symptoms. The Rumpel-Leede test was performed and reported positive. Epidemiology was notified of a probable dengue diagnosis with warning signs (thrombocytopenia). A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for dengue was performed. Treatment with chloroquine 150 mg every 24 hours and acetaminophen was resumed; azathioprine was not restarted. The patient showed improvement, without hemorrhage despite severe thrombocytopenia. The RT-PCR result, three days after the sample was taken, was positive for dengue (DENV-3 serotype). With the resolution of symptoms and no warning signs, she was discharged home after five days of hospitalization.

Discussion

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has a global incidence of 6.73 per 100,000 individuals in Caucasian populations and 31.4 per 100,000 in African American populations annually 3
3. Rees F, Doherty M, Grainge MJ, Lanyon P, Zhang W. The worldwide incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Nov 1;56(11):1945-1961. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex260. PMID: 28968809.
. The clinical findings of SLE are shown in Table 2 4
4. Wallace JD, Gladman Dafna D. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of systemic lupus in adults. UpToDate [Internet]. Uptodate.com. [citado el 9 de abril de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-adults
. The criteria of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) allow for the classification of the clinical presentation of SLE by systems and organs (Table 3) 5
5. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, Brinks R, Mosca M, Ramsey-Goldman R, Smolen JS, et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1400-1412. doi: 10.1002/art.40930. Epub 2019 Aug 6. PMID: 31385462; PMCID: PMC6827566.
. The SLEDAI (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index), later modified as MEX-SLEDAI for the Mexican population, evaluates disease activity during lupus exacerbation 15
15. Vera-Rivero DA, Chirino-Sánchez L, Martínez Lastre A, Medición de la actividad lúpica y daño acumulado en pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico. Rev Cuba Reumatol [Internet]. 2019 Ago [citado 2024 Abr 09]; 21 (2): e88. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1817-59962019000200007&lng=es.
, though the patient did not meet the criteria for exacerbation.

Initial treatment for SLE includes antimalarials, while glucocorticoids are recommended for controlling acute attacks and maintenance therapy 6
6. Sifuentes Giraldo WA, García Villanueva MJ, Boteanu AL, Lois Iglesias A, Zea Mendoza AC. New therapeutic targets in systemic lupus. Reumatol Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):201-7. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Apr 6. PMID: 22483661.
. Dengue is a zoonotic disease caused by the dengue virus (DENV), transmitted by Aedes aegypti 8
8. Frantchez V., Fornelli R., Graciela Pérez S., Arteta Z., Cabrera S., Sosa., et al. Dengue en adultos: diagnóstico, tratamiento y abordaje de situaciones especiales. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2016 Abr [citado 2023 Mar 23]; 32(1): 43-51. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-03902016000100006&lng=es.
. In Mexico, 12,671 cases were reported in 2022 (with an incidence of 9.74 per 100,000 inhabitants); 57% of these cases were concentrated in the states of Sonora, Veracruz, Estado de México, Tabasco, and Chiapas, with serotypes DENV-2 (56.03%) and DENV-3 (24.93%) being the most prevalent 7
7. Panorama Epidemiológico de Fiebre por Dengue y Fiebre Hemorrágica por Dengue con información del Sistema Especial de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Dengue. Publicación por Semana Epidemiológica a cargo de la Dirección de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Enfermedades Transmisibles. Semana Epidemiológica 52. Gob.mx. [citado el 05 de enero de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/878786/Pano_dengue_52_2023.pdf
. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), dengue is classified as: 1) Dengue without warning signs (suspected dengue due to residence in or travel to endemic areas, fever, and at least two symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, myalgia, arthralgia, leukopenia, or a positive tourniquet test); 2) Dengue with warning signs (same as the previous definition, plus any warning symptom such as abdominal pain, serositis, hemorrhages, altered mental status, visceromegaly, or a sudden drop in platelet count); and 3) Severe dengue (includes the previous signs plus evidence of organ or system damage, including multiple organ failure) 7
7. Panorama Epidemiológico de Fiebre por Dengue y Fiebre Hemorrágica por Dengue con información del Sistema Especial de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Dengue. Publicación por Semana Epidemiológica a cargo de la Dirección de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Enfermedades Transmisibles. Semana Epidemiológica 52. Gob.mx. [citado el 05 de enero de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/878786/Pano_dengue_52_2023.pdf
.In this case, the patient fell under the category of dengue with warning signs due to the presence of thrombocytopenia.

The diagnostic suspicion is based on acute febrile syndrome with clinical manifestations and demographic history. The Rumpel-Leede or tourniquet test is recommended by the WHO due to its ease of application and utility in decision-making. The test involves inflating the sphygmomanometer cuff on the upper arm to a point midway between the individual’s systolic and diastolic pressures and maintaining it inflated for five minutes. After deflation and two minutes of rest, the number of petechiae below the antecubital fossa is counted. The test is considered positive if more than 10 petechiae are present within a square inch of skin on the arm (16). Although the test has documented low sensitivity and specificity (58%, 95% CI: 43%-71%; and 71%, 95% CI: 60%-80%, respectively), it remains recommended as a decision-support tool in resource-limited areas 16
16. Grande AJ, Reid H, Thomas E, Foster C, Darton TC. Tourniquet Test for Dengue Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Aug 3;10(8):e0004888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004888. PMID: 27486661; PMCID: PMC4972435.
.

Confirmation of dengue is achieved through the detection of the virus via RT-PCR or the identification of the NS1 structural protein or specific IgM 11
11. Muller DA, Depelsenaire AC, Young PR. Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection. J Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 1;215(suppl_2):S89-S95. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw649. PMID: 28403441.
. Treatment is symptomatic, and depending on the severity, most cases are managed on an outpatient basis. Patients with comorbidities or signs of severe disease should be hospitalized 8
8. Frantchez V., Fornelli R., Graciela Pérez S., Arteta Z., Cabrera S., Sosa., et al. Dengue en adultos: diagnóstico, tratamiento y abordaje de situaciones especiales. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2016 Abr [citado 2023 Mar 23]; 32(1): 43-51. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-03902016000100006&lng=es.
.

In the clinical case presented, the patient, who had an exacerbation of lupus, revealed a recent trip to an endemic dengue area during the medical history interview. Diagnostic suspicion was based on the positive Rumpel-Leede test, which supported the decision to perform the confirmatory RT-PCR test, alongside laboratory results and patient history.

The use of immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and prednisone may have facilitated the severity of dengue in this case, as both drugs are known to cause bone marrow toxicity.

The variations in thrombocytopenia further supported the classification of the patient’s case as dengue with warning signs, which led to the management with intravenous fluids, up to 1000 milliliters in addition to oral intake. The patient experienced third-space fluid leakage, primarily in the lower limbs, during the first 48 hours of hospitalization, which resolved by the time of discharge.

Table 1. Laboratory results obtained during the hospital stay
Parameter 03/12/2024 03/13/2024 03/14/2024
COMPLETE BLOOD COUNT (CBC) Hemoglobin (g/dL) 14.6 15.62 14.86
Hematocrit 44.3 47.99 45.26
Platelets 79,800 53,000 34,000
Citrated Platelets
Leukocytes (cells/uL) 4,100 3,290 5,060
BLOOD CHEMISTRY Glucose (mg/dL) 101
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.71
Na+ (mmol/L) 135
K+ (mmol/L) 4.4
Cl- (mmol/L) 103
AST (mg/dL) 82
ALT (mg/dL) 19
Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.31
Direct Bilirubin (mg/dL) 18
Indirect Bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.13
Albumin (mg/dL)
LDH (U/L) 601
COAGULATION TIMES Prothrombin Time (PT) (seconds) 12.5
Control Prothrombin Time (seconds) 11.5
Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) (seconds) 35.6
International Normalized Ratio (INR) 1.09
Table 2. Spectrum of clinical symptoms in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Measurement of lupus activity and cumulative damage in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) 4
Affected System Symptom % of Occurrence
At Presentation During Lupus Activation
General Fatigue 50 74 to 100
Fever 36 40 to 80
Weight Changes 21 44 to 60
Myalgia and Arthralgia 62 to 67 83 to 95
Tegumentary General 73 80 to 91
Malar Rash 73 80 to 91
Photosensitivity 29 41 to 60
Mucosal Membrane Lesions 10 to 21 27 to 52
Alopecia 32 18 to 71
Raynaud's Phenomenon 17 to 33 22 to 71
Purpura 10 15 to 34
Urticaria 1 4 to 8
Renal General 16 to 38 34 to 73
Nephrosis 5 11 to 18
Gastrointestinal Esophagitis, Pseudo-obstruction 18 38 to 44
Splenomegaly 5 9 to 20
Hepatomegaly 2 7 to 25
Pulmonary General 2 to 12 24 to 98
Pleuritis 17 30 to 45
Effusion 24
Pneumonia 29
Cardiovascular General 15 20 to 46
Pericarditis 8 8 to 48
Murmurs 23
ECG Changes 34 to 70
Lymphadenopathy 7 to 16 21 to 50
Central Nervous System General 12 to 21 25 to 75
Functional Majority
Psychosis 1 5 to 52
Seizures 0.5 2 to 20
Table 3. Classification criteria of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) 2019
Entry Criterion (Required for classifying SLE)
ANA (antinuclear antibodies) at a titer >1:80 on Hep-2 cells or an equivalent positive test (at any time)
Domains and Clinical Criteria Score
Constitutional
Fever (>38 °C) 2
Hematologic
Leukopenia (<4000 cells/L) 3
Thrombocytopenia (<100,000 cells/L) 4
Autoimmune hemolysis (confirmed) 4
Neuropsychiatric
Delirium (characterized by changes in consciousness or reduced ability to concentrate; development of symptoms <2 days; symptom fluctuation throughout the day; acute/subacute changes in cognition or behavior) 2
Psychosis (characterized by hallucinations and in the absence of delirium) 3
Seizures (generalized or focal) 5
Mucocutaneous
Non-scarring alopecia (confirmed by a physician) 2
Oral ulcers (confirmed by a physician) 2
Subacute cutaneous lupus or discoid lupus (confirmed by a physician. If a skin biopsy is performed, typical changes must be present) 4
Acute cutaneous lupus (confirmed by a physician. If a skin biopsy is performed, typical changes must be present) 6
Serosal
Pleural or pericardial effusion (evidenced by imaging) 5
Acute pericarditis (2 or more: 1) Pericardial chest pain, 2) Pericardial rub, 3) ECG showing new generalized ST elevation or PR depression, 4) New or worsening pericardial effusion confirmed by imaging) 6
Musculoskeletal
Joint involvement (either: 1) Synovitis involving two or more joints; or 2) Tenderness in two or more joints with at least 30 minutes of morning stiffness) 6
Renal
Proteinuria (>0.5 g in 24 hours) 4
Renal biopsy reporting lupus nephritis class II or V 8
Renal biopsy reporting lupus nephritis class III or IV 8
Domains and Immunology Criteria Score
Antiphospholipid Antibodies
Anticardiolipin antibodies [IgA, IgG, or IgM at medium or high titer (>40 phospholipid units A (APL), GPL, or MPL, or >99th percentile)] or 2
Positive anti-B2GP1 antibodies (IgA, IgG, or IgM)
Positive lupus anticoagulant
Complement Proteins
Low C3 or low C4 3
Low C3 and low C4 4
SLE-Specific Antibodies
Anti-dsDNA antibodies or 6
Anti-Smith antibodies

Classification of SLE requires: 1) an entry criterion + 2) a total score of ≥10 points, and 3) at least one clinical criterion. A criterion should not be counted if there is a more likely explanation than SLE. The occurrence of a criterion on one or more occasions is sufficient, and the criteria do not need to occur simultaneously. Within each domain, only the highest-weighted criterion is counted toward the total score if more than one is present (Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus in adults) 5.

Conclusion

Distinguishing between lupus exacerbation and dengue infection can be challenging due to their overlapping clinical presentations. A thorough medical history is always essential to guide clinical suspicion and differentiate the diagnosis in a timely manner.

Additional Information

Conflict of Interest Declaration: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Author Contributions: CAFL contributed to: Conceptualization and design of the article; Data collection; Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting of the article; Critical revision of the article; Final approval of the version; Statistical, technical, administrative, and methodological advice. RAR contributed to: Drafting of the article; Critical revision of the article; Methodological advice; Final approval of the version. AGG contributed to: Conceptualization and design of the article; Data collection; Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting of the article. DPF contributed to: Drafting of the article; Critical revision of the article; Methodological advice; Final approval of the version. MSS contributed to: Drafting of the article; Critical revision of the article; Methodological advice; Final approval of the version. NRBR contributed to: Drafting of the article; Critical revision of the article; Methodological advice; Final approval of the version. AJMJ contributed to: Drafting of the article; Critical revision of the article; Methodological advice; Final approval of the version. Funding: Self-funded. Received: May 17, 2024 Accepted: August 20, 2024

Corresponding Author Information

Correspondence: Arturo García-Galicia Address: 2 Norte 2004, Colonia Centro, CP 72000, Puebla, Puebla, México Phone: (+52) 2221945360 Email: neurogarciagalicia@yahoo.com.mx

Published article by the Journal of the Faculty of Human Medicine of the Ricardo Palma University. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0 , which allows non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial use, please contact revista.medicina@urp.edu.pe.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

1

Kiriakidou M, Ching CL.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(11):ITC81-ITC96.

doi: 10.7326/AITC202006020

2

Harapan H, Michie A, Sasmono RT, Imrie A.

Dengue: A Minireview. Viruses. 2020;12(8):829.

doi: 10.3390/v12080829

3

Rees F, Doherty M, Grainge MJ, Lanyon P, Zhang W.

The worldwide incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(11):1945-1961.

doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex260

4

Wallace JD, Gladman Dafna D.

Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of systemic lupus in adults. UpToDate [Internet]. Uptodate.com.

Disponible en: UpToDate

5

Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, Brinks R, Mosca M, Ramsey-Goldman R, Smolen JS, et al.

2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(9):1400-1412.

doi: 10.1002/art.40930

6

Sifuentes Giraldo WA, García Villanueva MJ, Boteanu AL, Lois Iglesias A, Zea Mendoza AC.

New therapeutic targets in systemic lupus. Reumatol Clin. 2012;8(4):201-7.

doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2012.01.012

7

Panorama Epidemiológico de Fiebre por Dengue y Fiebre Hemorrágica por Dengue.

Dirección de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Enfermedades Transmisibles. Semana Epidemiológica 52. Gob.mx.

Disponible en: gob.mx

8

Frantchez V., Fornelli R., Graciela Pérez S., Arteta Z., Cabrera S., Sosa, et al.

Dengue en adultos: diagnóstico, tratamiento y abordaje de situaciones especiales. Rev. Méd. Urug. 2016;32(1):43-51.

Disponible en: SciELO

9

Aringer M, Costenbader K, Johnson SR.

Evaluación de los criterios de clasificación EULAR/ACR para pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico. Experto Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18(2):135-144.

10

Dima A, Jurcut C, Chasset F, Felten R, Arnaud L.

Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus: overview of current knowledge. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022;14:1759720X211073001.

11

Muller DA, Depelsenaire AC, Young PR.

Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(suppl_2):S89-S95.

doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw649

12

Guzman MG, Harris E.

Dengue. Lancet. 2015;385(9966):453-65.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60572-9

13

Medina F, Medina JF, Colón C, Vergne E, Santiago GA, Muñoz-Jordán JL.

Dengue virus: isolation, propagation, quantification, and storage. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2012;Chapter 15:Unit 15D.2.

doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc15d02s27

14

Soo KM, Khalid B, Ching SM, Chee HY.

Meta-Analysis of Dengue Severity during Infection by Different Dengue Virus Serotypes in Primary and Secondary Infections. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154760.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154760

15

Vera-Rivero DA, Chirino-Sánchez L, Martínez Lastre A.

Medición de la actividad lúpica y daño acumulado en pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico. Rev Cuba Reumatol. 2019;21(2):e88.

Disponible en: SciELO

16

Grande AJ, Reid H, Thomas E, Foster C, Darton TC.

Tourniquet Test for Dengue Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(8):e0004888.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004888