PROSPECTIVE PLANNING FOR TRAINING DEVELOPMENT OF LEARNING ON METHODOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS THROUGH ACCELERATED MODALITY

Authors

  • George Argota-Pérez Centro de Investigaciones Avanzadas y Formación Superior en Educación, Salud y Medio Ambiente ̈AMTAWI ̈, Puno-Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2560-6749
  • Ramiro M. Yallico-Calmett Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga (UNICA). Ica-Perú. Facultad de Ciencia de la Educación y Humanidades. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3082-3310
  • Kony L. Duran LLaro Escuela de Posgrado. Universidad César Vallejo (UCV). Trujillo-Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4825-3683
  • Jose Alberto Iannacone Laboratorio de Ingeniería Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Científica del Sur. Villa el Salvador, Lima, Perú. / Laboratorio de Ecología y Biodervisidad animal (LEBA). Facultad de ciencias naturales y matemática, Universidad Federico Villarreal. Lima, Perú. / Laboratorio de parasitologia. Facultad de ciencias biologicas. Universidad Ricardo Palma (URP). Lima, Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3699-4732
  • Rosa A. Aquije-García Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga (UNICA). Ica-Perú. Facultad de Ciencia de la Educación y Humanidades. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-7949
  • Flor A. Lavanda-Reyes Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga (UNICA). Ica-Perú. Facultad de Administración. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-9790

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31381/biotempo.v16i2.2527

Abstract

The aim of study was to evaluate the prospective planning for the formative development of learning about the methodology of scientific research in university students through accelerated modality. A differential prospective route was considered through accelerated training between April 22 and 26 (replica I) and from April 29 to May 3, 2019 (replica II) which was directed to, students of the 10th academic cycle belonging to the Faculty of Civil Engineering of National University San Luis Gonzaga of Ica, Peru. Two variables of interest were considered for analysis: 1st), responsibility before the social recognition of graduation (RSRG) and 2nd), number of project proposals to present (NPPP). The RSRG was evaluated by means of assistance and the advance on the practical activities developed in class. The RSRG was evaluated through assistance and progress on practical activities developed in class. The NPPP was evaluated by the percentage of compliance on the methodological structures formulated according to the format of research thesis project. The attendance and advance on the practical activities developed in class by the students decreased by day in replica I but remained in replica II. The NPPP in replica I was low (3) compared to replica II (18). It was considered that the efficient prospective route for learning the methodology of the research was the production and research on the theme proposal to be developed according to the recognition of the variables to be measured by the students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-12-18

How to Cite

Argota-Pérez, G., Yallico-Calmett, R. M., Duran LLaro, K. L., Iannacone, J. A., Aquije-García, R. A., & Lavanda-Reyes, F. A. (2019). PROSPECTIVE PLANNING FOR TRAINING DEVELOPMENT OF LEARNING ON METHODOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS THROUGH ACCELERATED MODALITY. Biotempo, 16(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.31381/biotempo.v16i2.2527

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales