PASSIVE MINERAL TREATMENT SYSTEM BEFORE THE ESTIMATED SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL COST IN OXIDATION LAGOON ANGOSTURA LIMÓN, ICA, PERU

Authors

  • George Argota Pérez Centro de Investigaciones Avanzadas y Formación Superior en Educación, Salud y Medio Ambiente ¨AMTAWI¨. Puno, Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2560-6749
  • José Iannacone Laboratorio de Ingeniería Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Científica del Sur. Villa el Salvador, Lima, Perú. / Laboratorio de Ecología y Biodervisidad animal (LEBA). Facultad de ciencias naturales y matemática, Universidad Federico Villarreal (UNFV). Lima, Perú. / Laboratorio de parasitologia. Facultad de ciencias biologicas. Universidad Ricardo Palma (URP). Lima, Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3699-4732

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31381/biotempo.v17i1.2998

Keywords:

environmental cost, ecotoxicological prediction, oxidation lagoon, physico-chemical parameters

Abstract

Effl uent pollution in oxidation ponds continues to be an environmental problem for which the search for practical solutions is required. Th e aim of the present study was to evaluate a passive mineral treatment system at the estimated sustainable environmental cost in the Angostura Limón oxidation lagoon, Ica-Peru. Th rough random probabilistic sampling, the following were measured from July to December 2018 in effl uent (without treatment and with treatment): biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), phosphate (PO4 3-), nitrite (NO2 -), nitrate (NO3 -), and ammonium (NH4 +). With the values of the physicochemical parameters, the relative sustainable environmental cost (COASOR) was estimated through a ratio between the evaluation cost (COA) and the cost of regulatory prevention (CONP). Th e removal percentage was calculated according to the environmental treatment system that was applied. Only the DO complied with the regulations where the COASOR estimate was 0.3 for the effl uent without treatment and with treatment indicating that the resource was relative non-sustainable. A removal percentage of 33.33% was obtained, so it was considered ineffi cient where the treatment order was: NH4 + > BOD5 > DO > PO4 3- = NO2 - = NO3 -. It was concluded that the wastewater that aff ects the limited use value and the passive environmental mineral treatment system was eff ective for the BOD5, although it did not comply with the recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-05-25

How to Cite

Argota Pérez, G., & Iannacone, J. (2020). PASSIVE MINERAL TREATMENT SYSTEM BEFORE THE ESTIMATED SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL COST IN OXIDATION LAGOON ANGOSTURA LIMÓN, ICA, PERU. Biotempo, 17(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.31381/biotempo.v17i1.2998

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales