Gaius meets cicero: law, legal practice, and rhetoric in gal., 4.114

Autores

  • T.G. Leesen Tilburg University, Tilburg, Países Bajos
  • O.E. Tellegen-Couperus Tilburg University, Tilburg, Países Bajos

Resumo

In the early Roman Principate, two law schools existed in Rome, the Sabinian or Cassian school and the Proculian school. Nearly all the prominent jurists of that time belonged to either the one or the other. The representatives of these law schools defended opposite positions over several points of private law, which are known in modern literature as the school controversies. The main sources that mention these school controversies are Gaius” Institutiones and Justinian's Institutiones, Digesta, and Codex.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BAVIERA I. 1940 Furlant. Firenze 1940 (repr. Firenze 1964).

BIRKS P. and G. MCLEOD 1987 Ithaca NY 1987, p.139. In our view, the German translation by C.E. Otto.

BRAET, A.C. 1987 The Classical Doctrine of status m and the Rhetorical Theory of Argumentation, Philosophy and Rhetoric 20 (1987).

BRAET, A.C. 1989 Variationen zur Statuslehre von Hermagoras bei Cicero, Rhetorica 7 (1989).

BUTTERFIELD, H. 1931 The Whig Interpretation of History, London 1931 (repr. New York 1978).

DEMANGEAT, C. 1876 Cours élémentaire de droit romain, 1, 3 edn., Paris 1876.

FALCHÍI, G.L. 1981 Le controversie tra Sabiniani e Proculiant, Milano 1981.

KARLOWA, O. 1885 Rómische Rechtsgeschichte, I, Leipzig 1885.

KASER, M.-K. HackL 1996 Das rómische Zivilprozessrecht, 2" edn., Minchen 1996.

LANGER, V. 2007 Declamatio Romanorum, Frankfurt 2007.

LEESEN, T.G. 2010 Gains Meets Cicero: Law and Rhetoric in the School Controversies, Boston-Leiden 2010.

PIETSCH, H. 1952 Satisfaction nach der Litis Contestatio, SZ 69 (1952).

REINHARDT, T. 2003 Marcus Tullius Cicero. Topica, Oxford 2003. |

SCACCHETTI, M.G. 1984 Note sulle differenze di metodo fra Sabinian e Proculiani, in:, in: A. BISCARDI (ed.), Studi in onore di Arnaldo Biscardi, V, Milano 1984.

SCARANA USSANI, V. 1997 Lars dei ginristi: considerazioni sullo statuto epistemologico della giurisprudenza romana, Torino 1997.

SCHULZ, F. o y 5 1946 History of Roman Legal Science, Oxford 1946 (repr. 1967).

SOKOLOWSKL, P. 1986 Die Lehre von der Specification, SZ 17 (1986).

STEIN, P. 1972 The Two Schools of Jurists in the Early Roman Principate, CL] 31 (1972).

STUDEMUND, G. 1965 Gai Institutionum. Commentaril Quattuor, Osnabrick 1874 (repr. 1965).

TELLEGEN, JW. 1988 Gains Cassins and the Schola Cas y siana in Pliny's Letter VII 24.8, $Z 105 (1988).

TELLEGEN-COUPERUS, O.E 1993 A Short History of Roman Law, . London-New York 1993.

TELLEGEN-COUPERUS, O.E.-J.W. TELLEGEN 2006 Nibil hoc ad ius, ad Ciceronem, o RIDA 53 (2006).

THOMAS, J.A.C. 1975 The Institutes of Justinian. Text, Translation and Commentary, Oxford 1975.

VOIGT, M. 1889 Rómische Rechtsgeschichte, 1, Stuttgart 1889 (repr. Aalen 1963).

WIEACKER, F. 1988 Rómische Rechtsgeschichte. Quellenkunde, Rechtsbildung, Jurisprudenz und Rechtsliteratur, l, Mún y chen 1988.

Downloads

Publicado

2011-10-11

Como Citar

Leesen, T., & Tellegen-Couperus, O. (2011). Gaius meets cicero: law, legal practice, and rhetoric in gal., 4.114. Ius Inkarri, 1(1), 283–297. Recuperado de https://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/5624

Edição

Seção

Artículos de investigación