Los derechos de propiedad privada en la perspectiva del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. ¿Las ovejas negras de los derechos humanos?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59885/iusinkarri.2023.v12n14.10Palavras-chave:
human rights, private property rights, human rights protection systemsResumo
El presente trabajo implica un estudio de los derechos de propiedad privada desde la óptica del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Para ello se analizarán los sistemas de protección de Naciones Unidas, europeo e interamericano, tanto en lo referido al tratamiento que se hace del derecho de propiedad privada en sus principales cuerpos normativos, como en lo relativo a las interpretaciones de los órganos pertenecientes a aquellos. Aún estando consagrados en declaraciones, tratados y convenciones de esos sistemas, los derechos de propiedad privada gozan de una pertenencia sumamente precaria y limitada a estos. Su subordinación constante a otros derechos —como los DESC— e instituciones —función social, justicia social, sociedad democrática, etc.— los deja ampliamente sometidos al arbitrio estatal, lo que termina atentando contra la posibilidad de ser catalogados como derechos humanos a la luz del derecho internacional.
Downloads
Referências
Alvarez, J. E. (2018). The Human Right of Property. University of Miami Law Review, Forthcoming, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 18-21. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3150903
Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor (2008). Making the Law Work for everyone: Vol 1 – Report of the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/document/making-the-law-work-for-everyone-vol-1-report-ofthe-commission-on-legal-empowerment-of-the-poor/
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (1979). Marckx v. Belgium. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57534%22]}
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (1982). Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid% 22:[%22001-57580%22]}
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (1986). James and Others v. The United Kingdom. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur#{%22item id%22:[%22001-57507%22]}
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (1989). Mellacher and Others v. Austria. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid% 22:[%22001-57616%22]}
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (2000). The former King of Greece and Others v. Greece. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22 itemid%22:[%22001-59051%22]}
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (2007). Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-78981%22]}
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (2016a). Case of Apap Bologna v. Malta. https://www.fairhuurvoorverhuurders.nl/files/evrm/CASE%20OF%20APAP%20BOLOGNA%20v.%20MALTA.pdf
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (2016b). Béláné Nagy v. Hungary. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-169663%22]}
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (2022). Guide on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property. [Updated on 31 August 2022]. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Guide_Art_1_Protocol_1_ENG
Funzalida, S. (2020). La jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos sobre el derecho a la propiedad, ¿concepción liberal o republicana? Estudios Constitucionales, 18(1), 259-308. https://www.readcube.com/articles/10.4067%2Fs0718-52002020000100259
Hannum, H. (1996). The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, 25, 287-397. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/gjicl/article/1396/
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2001a). Case of IvcherBronstein v. Peru. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_74_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2001b). Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni community v. Nicaragua. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_79_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR). (2003). Case of the “Five Pensioners” v. Peru. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_98_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2005a). Case of Palamara Iribarne v. Chile. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_135_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2005b). Case of the Yakye Axa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_125_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2006). Case of the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_146_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2007). Case of Chaparro Álvarez and Lapo Íñiguez v. Ecuador. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_170_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2008). Salvador Chiriboga v. Ecuador. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_179_esp.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2015). Case of Granier et al. (Radio Caracas Televisión) v. Venezuela. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_293_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ICHR) (2016). Ownership of Rights of Legal Persons in the Inter-American System (Interpretation and scope of article 1.2, in conjunction with articles 1.1, 8, 11.2, 13, 16, 21, 24, 25, 29, 30, 44, 46, and 62.3 of the American Convention on Human Rights Articles 8.1 A and B of the Protocol of San Salvador). Advisory Opinion OC- 22/16 of 26 February 2016. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_22_ing.pdf
López, S. (2015). Property and its deprivation or restriction in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court. Revista Ius et Praxis, (1), 531 – 576.
Mchangama, J. (2011, May/June). The Right to Private Property in Global Human Rights Law. CATO Institute. https://www.cato.org/policyreport/may/june-2011/right-property-global-human-rights-law
Nicol, D. (2020). The Constitutional Protection of Capitalism. Hart Publishing.
Organization of American States (OAS) (1948). American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man.
Organization of American States (OAS) (1969). American Convention on Human Rights. https://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.htm
Organization of American States (OAS) (1988). Additional Protocol in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-52.html
Organization of American States (OAS) (n.d.). Protocol to Abolish the Death Penalty. https://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-53.html
Special Rapporteur on the right to food (2010). Olivier De Schutter. The right to food. 11th August 2010. https://undocs.org/Home/Mobile?FinalSymbol=A%2F65%2F281&Language=E&DeviceType=Desktop&LangRequested=False
Special Rapporteur on the right to food (2020). Hilal Elver. Critical Perspective on food systems, food crises and the future of the right to food. 21 January 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/ahrc4344-critical-perspective-food-systemsfood-crises-and-future-right
United Nationes (UN) (1966). International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
United Nations (UN) (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
United Nations (UN) (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/human-rights/universal-declaration/translations/english
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Patricio D’Acunti
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
