A conventional reading applicable to first instance decisions in the matter of protection

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31381/iusinkarri.v9n9.3683

Keywords:

conventionality control, amparo process, judicial use, constitutional rulings

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to make a specific decision regarding the convening use used by the judge of first instance when ruling cases in constitutional matters (10 sentences of amparo process). For this purpose, a journey of main ideas is made about internally headquartered conventionality and its expressions of judicial use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2006). Caso Almonacid Arellano y otros vs. Chile. Sentencia de 26 de septiembre de 2006 (Excepciones preliminares, fondo, reparaciones y costas).

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2011). Caso Gelman vs. Uruguay. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011 (Fondo y reparaciones).

Ferrer Mac-Gregor, E. (2012). El control difuso de convencionalidad. Diálogo entre la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y Jueces Nacionales. Fundap.

Urgorgue-Larsen, L. (2010). La erradicación de la impunidad: claves para descifrar la política jurisprudencial de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. UNAM.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-11

How to Cite

Castañeda Méndez, J. A. (2020). A conventional reading applicable to first instance decisions in the matter of protection. Ius Inkarri, 9(9), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.31381/iusinkarri.v9n9.3683

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 9 (2020)

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Juan Alberto Castañeda Méndez

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.