La interseccionalidad y los derechos humanos: una aproximación bioética

Yuri Zambrano

doi:10.59885/iusinkarri.2024.v13n16.04

Authors

Yuri Zambrano Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5008-1093

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59885/iusinkarri.2024.v13n16.04

Keywords:

intersectionality, power, discrimination, bioethics, vulnerability

Abstract

Intersectionality is a tool of analysis based primarily on the specific identification of social inequalities and the possibility of confronting their injustices in the field of human rights. Such inequalities generate a multidimensional spectrum whose line of categorisation is viewed through the lens of classical concepts of domination.

This article discusses four salient elements of intersectionality in philosophy of law: a) its general background, b) the ideology of domination and the philosophical approach to power, c) the relation of oppression to elements of human rights such as discrimination in cases of race, disability, ethnicity and nation, gender, education, social class, religion, age and sex and, finally, d) some bioethical-legal considerations directed towards an updated state of the art.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Álvarez, S. (2015). La autonomía personal y la autonomía relacional. Aná- lisis Filosófico, 35(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2015.44

Baier, A. (1985). Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals. University of Minnesota Press.

Beauchamp, T., y Childress, J. (1999). Principios de ética biomédica. Prólogo de Diego Gracia. Masson.

Bilge, S., y Hill Collins, P. (2019). Interseccionalidad. Morata.

Bobbio, N. (1996). Estado, gobierno y sociedad, por una teoría general de la política. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: the methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 59(5-6), 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z

Brison, S. J. (2000). Relational Autonomy and Freedom of Expression. En C. Mackenzie y N. Stoljar (eds.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self (pp. 280-299). Oxford University Press.

Burdeau, G. (1984). Tratado de ciencia política, t. 1, vol. iii. (Gordon, B., trad.). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Butler, J. (2020). The Force of Nonviolence: An Ethico-Political Bind. Verso.

Camps, V. (2013). Presentación. En C. Gilligan, La ética del cuidado (pp. 7-9). Cuadernos de la Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas. https:// www.revistaseden.org/boletin/files/6964_etica_del_cuidado_ 2013.pdf

Carpizo, J. (1999). El poder: su naturaleza, su tipología y los medios de comunicación masiva. Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, 32(95), 321-356. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.1999.95.3588

Church Terrell, M. (2005 [1940]). A Colored Woman in a White World. Prometheus Books.

Code, L. (1991). What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornell University Press.

Coleman, K. (2015). The Voting Rights Act of 1965, Background and Overview. Washington, Congressional Research Service. https:// crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43626/15

Combahee River Collective. (1977). A black feminist statement. The Combahee River Collective Statement. https://americanstudies.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Keyword%20Coalition_Readings.pdf

Cooper, B. (2015). Intersectionality. En L. Disch y M. Hawkesworth (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory (pp. 385-406). Oxford University Press.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum, (1), 139-167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf

Davis, A. (1981). Mujeres, raza y clase [epub libre]. Ronin, https://www.legisver.gob.mx/equidadNotas/publicacionLXIII/Angela%20Davis%20-%20Mujeres,%20raza%20y%20clase%20(1981).pdf

De Sousa Santos, B. (2022). Poscolonialismo, decolonialidad y epistemologías del Sur (L. Mosconi, trad.). Conselho Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociais (Clacso).

Dundas, P. (2003). The Jains. Routledge.

Fineman, M. A. (2010). The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal, 60(2), 251-275.

Foucault, M. (1975). Vigilar y castigar. Siglo XXI Editores.

Foucault, M. (1977). Historia de la sexualidad 1: La voluntad de saber. Siglo XXI Editores.

Foucault, M. (1979). Microfísica del poder. La Piqueta.

Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France (1978-1979). EHESS; Gallimard; Seuil.

French, J., y Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. En D. Cartwright (ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150-167). Institute for Social Research.

Galbraith, J. K., (1984). La anatomía del poder. Plaza y Janés.

Garrido, G. M. (2022). Vulnerabilidad, grupos vulnerables e interseccionalidad. Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político, 17, 307-322.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.

Gilligan, C. (2011). Joining the Resistance. Polity Press.

Grabe, S. (2020). Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Examples Informed by a Decade of Collaborative Work With Majority World Women’s Grassroots Activism. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 494309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.494309

Han, B. -C. (2014). Psicopolítica: Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder (A. Bergés, trad.). Herder.

Hart, H. L. A. (1961). El concepto de derecho (G. R. Carrió, trad.). Abeledo Perrot.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1999). Principios de filosofía del derecho o derecho natural y ciencia política (J. L. Vermal Beretta, trad.). Edhasa.

Hensch, T. K. (2004). Critical period regulation. Annual Review Neuroscience, 27, 549-579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144327

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., y Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGrawHill.

Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.

Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas (Inali). (s. f.). Catálogo de las lenguas indígenas nacionales. https://www.inali.gob.mx/clin-inali/

Jecker, N. S., Atuire, C., Ravitsky, V., Behrens, K., y Ghaly, M. W. (2024). War, Bioethics, and Public Health. The American Journal of Bioethics, (7), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2377118

Levine, C., Faden, R., Grady, C., Hammerschmidt, D., Eckenwiler, L., y Sugarman, J., (2004). The Limitations of «Vulnerability» as a Protection for Human Research Participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 4(3), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160490497083

Lorde, A. (2007). La hermana, la extranjera (M. Corniero, trad.). Horas y Horas.

Luna, F. (2008). Vulnerabilidad: la metáfora de las capas. Revista LexisNexis. Jurisprudencia Argentina, 4(1), 60-67.

Mackenzie, C. (2014). The Importance of Relational Autonomy and Capabilities for an Ethics of Vulnerability. En C. MacKenzie, W. Rogers y S. Dodds (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminists Philosophy (pp. 33-59). Oxford University Press.

Mackinnon, C. (2013). Intersectionality as Method: A Note. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 1019-1030.

Marina, J. A. (2008). La pasión del poder. Teoría y práctica de la dominación. Anagrama.

Ministerio de Justicia de la Nación. (2021). Decreto n.o 476/2021. Boletín Oficial, Folio n.o 51190/21 v. 21/07/2021. Buenos Aires: 20 de julio de 2021. https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/350000-354999/352187/norma.htm

Morgan, K. P. (1996). Describing the Emperor’s New Clothes: Three Myths of Education (In)Equality. En A. Diller, N. Houston, K. P. Morgan y M. Ayim (eds.), The Gender Question in Education, Theory, Pedagogy & Politics. Westview Press & Routledge.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjetcs of Biomedical and Behavioral Research [Comisión Nacional para la Protección de los Sujetos Humanos en la Investigación Biomédica y Conductual]. (1978). The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Washington: 30 de septiembre de 1978. https://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (Unesco), Comisión Internacional de Bioética. (2005). Declaración Universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos. París: 19 de octubre de 2005. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/343573/6._INTL._Dec._Universal_Bioetica_y_Der_Humanos.pdf

Rogers, W. (2014). Vulnerability and Bioethics. En C. MacKenzie, W. Rogers y S. Dodds (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminists Philosophy (pp. 60-87). Oxford University Press.

United States District Court M. D. Alabama, N. D. (1956). Browder v. Gayle. Sentencia Jurídica 142 F. Supp. 707. Alabama: 5 de junio de 1956. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/142/707/2263463/

Spelman, E. (1988) Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought, Beacon.

Weber, M. (2007 [1919]). La política como profesión (J. Abellán, ed. y trad.). Biblioteca Nueva.

Webster, C. S., Taylor, S., Thomas, C., y Weller, J. M. (2022). Social bias, discrimination and inequity in healthcare: mechanisms, implications and recommendations, BJA Education, 22(4), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2021.11.011

Zambrano, Y. (2012). Neuroepistemology: What the neurons knowledge tries to tell us. Phy Psi K’a Publishing.